| Thread Review (Newest First) |
| Posted by admin - 09-11-2025, 12:58 AM |
| AGAIN EAT SHIT FUCKER...I AM GOING TO WIN, AND I AM GOING TO SUE THIS FUCKING TOWN, STATE AND THE FUCKING ASSHOLD COCK LICKING BUDDIES AT THE FBI!!! |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-11-2025, 12:56 AM |
|
Wow, you didn't even use AI. I'm impressed. EAT SHIT FUCKER actually is the most intelligent thing you have said in a while. But doesn't change the fact, the judge blamed YOU. And if Wykoff withdraws, the judge won't assign you new counsel, he'll put you into the psych ward. You probably been there before. |
| Posted by admin - 09-11-2025, 12:52 AM |
| EAT SHIT FUCKER!!! |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-11-2025, 12:50 AM |
|
Not according to the judge. He blamed you and you alone for losing Tiffany. You had your chance and you took you hand and stuck it in your asshole. If you lose Wykoff, you will certainly be ruled incapable of contributing to your defense and be put into a psych ward for evaluation. |
| Posted by admin - 09-11-2025, 12:23 AM |
| GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLE. YOU'RE INTERFERING WITH A COURT CASE |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-10-2025, 11:44 PM |
|
Nope, he'll decide everything from this point forward. Remember, he can always drop you as a client if you don't follow his directions. I bet he would get real upset if he finds you're discussing that case, you know the same shit that caused Tiffany to leave. I'll decide when and where |
| Posted by admin - 09-09-2025, 02:38 AM |
|
Under Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.2, the client: Determines the objectives of representation. Has the final say on plea decisions, testifying, and whether to assert constitutional rights. Must be consulted on strategy, even if the lawyer handles technical decisions. And under Rule 1.4, your lawyer must: Keep you reasonably informed. Explain matters so you can make informed decisions. Consult with you about the means used to achieve your goals. So no, your lawyer doesn’t get to “decide everything” unilaterally. If they’re ignoring your direction, that’s not strategy—it’s a breach of duty. |
| Posted by admin - 09-09-2025, 02:36 AM |
|
You’re confusing sarcasm with substance—and neither changes the facts. Chain of custody matters. Delays in transferring seized devices raise legitimate concerns about contamination, tampering, or unauthorized access. That’s not speculation—it’s forensic protocol. The Illinois State Police have certified labs and procedures for handling digital evidence. Choosing to bypass them in favor of the FBI—after the warrant was quashed—isn’t just questionable, it’s constitutionally suspect. As for my attorney: he doesn’t operate in a vacuum. He acts on strategy, evidence, and client direction. If you think a fax or an email will override constitutional violations, you’re mistaking drama for due process. This isn’t about whether someone “cares.” It’s about whether the law was followed. And in this case, it wasn’t. |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025, 02:06 AM |
| Nope, he doesn't care. Him and him alone will decide everything from now on, unless he motions to leave you, which could happen if he reads the right emails or better yet, the right fax. Fax will ensure he reads it. |
| Posted by admin - 09-09-2025, 02:04 AM |
| I wouldn't bet on that |
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Read the whole thread. |