Post a New Reply
Reply to thread: United States v. Steven Anderegg
Username:
Post Subject:
Post Icon:no icon
Your Message: Smilies [get more]
Post Options:	Disable Smilies: disable smilies from showing in this post.
Thread Subscription: Specify the type of notification and thread subscription you'd like to have to this thread. (Registered users only)	Do not subscribe to this thread Subscribe without receiving any notification of new replies Subscribe and receive email notification of new replies Subscribe and receive PM notification of new replies

Attachments
Your allocated attachment usage quota is Unlimited.
	New Attachment:

Thread Review (Newest First)

Posted by admin - 04-09-2026, 02:10 AM

United States v. Steven Anderegg Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (2025) This has to do with images made with AI and the right to look at obscene material in the privacy of one home (Stanley v Georgia 1969) 28:26 Would you concede that if the AI-generated data isn't produced on that computer 28:35 but goes off to some website, some, you know, AWS or whatever, 28:42 that is housing something, and then the image comes back to the computer, 28:47 then it's transported? 28:48 I mean, you're making it sound like this is really just, you know, 28:53 produced on the computer sitting in someone's house. 28:56 Yeah. 28:56 But I'm not sure. 28:57 I'm not trying to get into technological. this shows the judge in this case knows nothing about AI or how AI works. There is sites that you can go to and make images, which go over interstate commerce back to one's computer, BUT you can also run a LLM (Local Language Machine) which doesn't go over the internet and is on the person computer and doesn't use the internet. THAT WHY THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOW TO MAKE RULING ON THIS STUFF, because they have no concept on how it works.