Post a New Reply
Reply to thread: JUST A REMINDER FOR YOU BITCHES
Username:
Post Subject:
Post Icon:no icon
Your Message: Smilies [get more]	[quote="admin" pid='123' dateline='1782078402'] [color=#292e33][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES [/font][/color][color=#292e33][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. [b][u]COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT [/u][/b][/font][/color][color=#292e33][b][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][u]WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF [/u][/font][/b][/color][color=#292e33][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][b][u]THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.[/u][/b] MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED.[/font][/color] [color=#292e33][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.[/font][/color] [/quote]
Post Options:	Disable Smilies: disable smilies from showing in this post.
Thread Subscription: Specify the type of notification and thread subscription you'd like to have to this thread. (Registered users only)	Do not subscribe to this thread Subscribe without receiving any notification of new replies Subscribe and receive email notification of new replies Subscribe and receive PM notification of new replies

Attachments
Your allocated attachment usage quota is Unlimited.
	New Attachment:

Thread Review (Newest First)

Posted by ONLY TWO WORDS NEEDED - 06-24-2026, 05:08 PM

Always the first result on any search..

Posted by admin - 06-21-2026, 05:46 PM

SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED. COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.