Todd Daugherty's Official Board › General › Main Board › THANKS TOAD FOR POSTING THIS AND IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY
Post Reply

Post a New Reply
Reply to thread: THANKS TOAD FOR POSTING THIS AND IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY
Username:
Post Subject:
Post Icon:
Your Message:
Smilies
Smile Wink Cool Big Grin
Tongue Rolleyes Shy Sad
At Angel Angry Blush
Confused Dodgy Exclamation Heart
Huh Idea Sleepy Undecided
[get more]
Post Options:
Thread Subscription:
Specify the type of notification and thread subscription you'd like to have to this thread. (Registered users only)




Attachments
Your allocated attachment usage quota is Unlimited.
New Attachment:


Thread Review (Newest First)
Posted by admin - 08-02-2025, 04:28 PM
you act like the case is over its hasn't even started. we've been in pretrial for four years now. The trail hasn't even started.

i don't have to appel anything.

1. they didn't have probable cause
2. they didn't corroborate the tip to get probable cause
3. the warrant was a general warrant because:
a. they didn't corroborate the tip to get probable cause
b. it didn't particularize what they were supposed to seize
3. they didn't execute the warrant with in the 96 hours they are required. (execute means to both search and seize what in the warrant)
4. The warrant was quashed
5. The image was computer generated and legal
6. the found the image without a warrant
7. they waited too long to get a second warrant waiting almost three years to get it.
Posted by TODD DRESSED AS A GIRL IN HS - 08-02-2025, 03:59 PM
You aren't appealing anything. Do you think your father can afford another $10,000 to $20,000 for that? And don't say "pro se", we know that isn't going to happen.

You can challenge it in probable cause. Don't you remember it was challenged in your 2015 hearing? The judge told the state "That's all you got"?? and the state was forced to Nolle Presqui

Your lawyer did nothing in 2022 in your prelim hearing....

Why are you so afraid of her after accusing her of sucking dicks at the police station?? You should be suing her for even reading that 3rd party email that was sent, she wasn't allowed to do that.

Oh well, you are a fuck up.
Posted by admin - 08-02-2025, 03:41 PM
and I will cite PEOPLE v. BARGER (2020) Illinois court of appeals.
Posted by admin - 08-02-2025, 03:40 PM
You don't challenge it in probable cause, idiot. like I said it's not child porn under Illinois law...and I will challenge it too
Posted by TODD DRESSED AS A GIRL IN HS - 08-02-2025, 03:32 PM
Too bad the judge said otherwise and declared it probable cause to charge you.  And your public defender didn't challenge it either.

I WIN
Posted by admin - 08-02-2025, 12:07 PM
BTW the description Dorwart describes isn't child porn under Illinois law.

Under the child pornography law in Illinois, they have to be either engaged in a sexual act and or the image has to be lewd, A child standing with her arms out holding a blanket in the background cannot under Illinois law be consider lewd.
Posted by TODD DRESSED AS A GIRL IN HS - 08-02-2025, 02:33 AM
(08-02-2025, 12:36 AM)admin Wrote: I don't either go ahead and do it. You interfering will get the whole court case toss

That's what you said last time when your public defender was contacted. You saw how that turned out for you.

Who did the judge blame? IT WAS YOU!!!!

But you should be happy that you want us to help you get your case tossed, shouldn't you? Heck you might even do it yourself under the pretense of a nym.
Posted by admin - 08-02-2025, 12:36 AM
I don't either go ahead and do it. You interfering will get the whole court case toss
Posted by TODD DRESSED AS A GIRL IN HS - 08-02-2025, 12:19 AM
[Image: giphy.gif]

[Image: R.e0f852d12442af72435434d9a6ff1525?rik=z...ImgRaw&r=0]

[Image: 5oqtjb.gif]
Posted by admin - 08-01-2025, 10:25 PM
You know contacting my lawyer as you did the public defender can be considered interfering with a court case and obstruction justice
This thread has more than 10 replies. Read the whole thread.