| Thread Review (Newest First) |
| Posted by admin - 09-11-2025, 02:46 PM |
(09-11-2025, 12:59 AM)TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD Wrote: Of course the state continued to investigate, you gave them permission to do so and the judge confirmed it. the judge even asked you if you understood an you said, "yup". No i didn't you dumbass |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-11-2025, 12:59 AM |
|
Of course the state continued to investigate, you gave them permission to do so and the judge confirmed it. the judge even asked you if you understood an you said, "yup". You're fucked. |
| Posted by admin - 09-11-2025, 12:57 AM |
| nope because the state continued to investigate me AFTER THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED AND PROBABLE CAUSE WAS PROVEN TO BE NOT TRUE. |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-11-2025, 12:55 AM |
More AI nonsense.... howeverQuote:but that clock doesn’t start ticking until the plaintiff knows or should have known of the injury and its cause. Which you knew in April 2018 when you said you were going to sue.... That's over 7 years ago. Your statute of limitations has long expired. Get the fuck over it. |
| Posted by admin - 09-09-2025, 02:22 AM |
|
Actually, that’s incorrect both factually and legally. The statute of limitations for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. §1983 in Illinois is two years—but that clock doesn’t start ticking until the plaintiff knows or should have known of the injury and its cause. That’s called the discovery rule, and it’s especially relevant when misconduct is concealed or when the harm continues over time. In my case, the devices were unlawfully retained and searched after the warrant was quashed and charges dismissed. The FBI didn’t even seek a second warrant until March 2, 2020, and they claimed possession under a state warrant that no longer existed. That’s not just sloppy—it’s unconstitutional. As for the idea that “the town isn’t charging you,” that’s a dodge. The City of Taylorville, Christian County, and the State of Illinois all played roles in the unlawful arrest, seizure, and transfer of my property. The FBI’s involvement doesn’t erase the local misconduct—it compounds it. So no, the statute hasn’t “long expired.” And yes, the town, county, and federal actors are all implicated. The Constitution doesn’t grant immunity just because the paperwork changed hands. |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025, 02:13 AM |
|
Even if your town did violate your rights, statute of limitations has long, long, expired. Which of course they never did.... Your town isn't charging you, thus the actions of the state have no bearing on the City of Taylorville nor the FBI nor the county. Thus Statute of Limitations is long expired. |
| Posted by admin - 09-09-2025, 02:08 AM |
| Violation of someone's rights is not a mental illness |
| Posted by TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025, 01:58 AM |
|
Mental illness. Poor retard Toad, wants to try the case on the internet instead of a real courtroom. If the internet was the trial room, you would have been guilty years ago, and properly punished or killed. Too bad it's not legal. |
| Posted by admin - 09-06-2025, 09:46 PM |
| Why did the police send the digital devices to the FBI and NOT the state police forensic lab. Where they afraid the state police who see that the search warrant was a general warrant and was later quashed and not touch it?? |
| Posted by admin - 09-06-2025, 03:24 PM |
|
Why is the state and this court allowing this game to go on as long as it has?? (4 years) (8 years if you want to count the original charge back in 2018) The warrant was a general warrant, that was quashed, and the FBI searched the computers without a warrant. There was no consent (Like some believe) in fact the FBI even told the Federal judge when they got the second warrant that they had those computers under a valid state warrant that allowed the seizure of all digital devices. So even the FBI knew there was no consent, that it was based on a search warrant which they believed was vali, when in fact it was quashed, WHICH BRINGS ME TO THE NEXT QUESTION... The FBI was made aware that the charges were dropped by the police, why didn't the FBI call the state or the courthouse and ask if the warrant was still valid (FYI they didn't call or there is no record of them calling)? Why didn't check the warrant to see if it complied with the fourth amendment? Is that why the AUSA didn't want to take the case, because he knew the warrant was a general warrant? |
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Read the whole thread. |