Todd Daugherty's Official Board › General › Main Board › THE FBI, CITY OF TAYLORVILLE, AND STATE OF ILLINOIS ARE STILL WAITING
Post Reply

Post a New Reply
Reply to thread: THE FBI, CITY OF TAYLORVILLE, AND STATE OF ILLINOIS ARE STILL WAITING
Username:
Post Subject:
Post Icon:
Your Message:
Smilies
Smile Wink Cool Big Grin
Tongue Rolleyes Shy Sad
At Angel Angry Blush
Confused Dodgy Exclamation Heart
Huh Idea Sleepy Undecided
[get more]
Post Options:
Thread Subscription:
Specify the type of notification and thread subscription you'd like to have to this thread. (Registered users only)




Attachments
Your allocated attachment usage quota is Unlimited.
New Attachment:


Thread Review (Newest First)
Posted by admin - 4 hours ago
I would bet on it. I have two years to file, and them not returning my property will be used against them in my suit.
Posted by - 4 hours ago
Quote:.who the FUCK DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO WIN MOTHERFUCKERS!!

They are. Two months in jail, Mommy & Daddy paying $7,500 and more to come...

They are still waiting for the lawsuit.... 15 years of threatening lawsuits, never filed a single one, and you never will.
Posted by admin - 05-02-2026, 04:00 PM
I mean seriously:

SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED.COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.

Then they refuse to return my 15 ITEMS ....who the FUCK DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO WIN MOTHERFUCKERS!!
Posted by admin - 05-02-2026, 03:54 PM
Like I said, I have two years, right now I am waiting to get all 15 of my items back. If I did get them back I will use it against them.
Posted by - 05-01-2026, 11:29 PM
That was fucking awesome

(04-18-2026, 07:22 PM)FBI INFORMANT Wrote: STILL NO LAWSUIT FILED FOR $100 MILLION AND NEVER WILL BE. TOO BAD. TWO MONTHS IN JAIL, $7,500 YOUR PARENTS HAD TO PAY OUT, JUST FOR A PRANK THAT TWO TEENAGERS DID IN CANADA.

POOR BABY.
Posted by admin - 04-28-2026, 09:08 PM
I have two years ...wait and see bitch
Posted by - 04-28-2026, 08:56 PM
They are still waiting for your lawsuit....

[Image: 3o6Zt2l7JNe272QpqM.webp]
Posted by admin - 04-21-2026, 12:50 AM
which raises a question HOW MANY OTHER PEOPLE HAS THE POLICE AND THE STATE FUCKED OVER by going through that person stuff without a warrant? How many other people are in jail, who aren't supposed to be there, because the city and the state's bullshit?
Posted by admin - 04-21-2026, 12:44 AM
BTW IT MUST REALLY SUCK FOR YOUR BUDDIES!!!

SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES
THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE AND AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT
WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF
THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED.
COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.
Posted by admin - 04-19-2026, 06:57 PM
The 2‑year limit doesn’t start at the arrest because the criminal case was still active.
You can’t file a civil‑rights lawsuit while the prosecution is ongoing.
The clock starts when the case ends in your favor — which for me was February 2026, with the appeal window closing in March 2026.

And right now, we’re still dealing with the fact that the State hasn’t returned the 15 devices they seized.
As of April 19, 2026, they still haven’t given them back.

So no — the deadline hasn’t passed.
The case isn’t even in the phase where a lawsuit could be filed yet because the State hasn’t finished returning the property they took.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Read the whole thread.