+- Todd Daugherty's Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Here's a question.. (/showthread.php?tid=526)
Pages:
1
2
Here's a question.. - admin - 09-02-2025
Why did the assistant chief of police leave a note on one of the devices with a BIG circle saying "stays at TPD" anyone??
![[Image: 1.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/pol2018/1.jpg)
![[Image: 2.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/pol2018/2.jpg)
![[Image: 3.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/pol2018/3.jpg)
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-02-2025
BTW it claims there was 14 documents from CTI (PAGE 3) why were they not in discovery??
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-02-2025
Another thing you must remember. Then police got those computers on March 21st 2018. The FBI didn't pick them up until April 11th. That gave the Taylorville Police Department 21 days—three full weeks—to access, examine, copy, or manipulate the seized devices before the FBI took custody.
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-05-2025
See, the way they are supposed to do it is to the seize the devices and then hand them over to the lab. not wait three weeks to hand them over. By waiting it raises concern of contamination of the devices. Another question is why didn't they send them to the state police labs instead of the FBI? The Illinois state police is very well equipped to do searches of electronic devices.
RE: Here's a question.. - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025
Too bad your lawyer doesn't care. And that's all that matters..
hehehehehe
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-09-2025
I wouldn't bet on that
RE: Here's a question.. - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025
Nope, he doesn't care. Him and him alone will decide everything from now on, unless he motions to leave you, which could happen if he reads the right emails or better yet, the right fax. Fax will ensure he reads it.
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-09-2025
You’re confusing sarcasm with substance—and neither changes the facts.
Chain of custody matters. Delays in transferring seized devices raise legitimate concerns about contamination, tampering, or unauthorized access. That’s not speculation—it’s forensic protocol. The Illinois State Police have certified labs and procedures for handling digital evidence. Choosing to bypass them in favor of the FBI—after the warrant was quashed—isn’t just questionable, it’s constitutionally suspect.
As for my attorney: he doesn’t operate in a vacuum. He acts on strategy, evidence, and client direction. If you think a fax or an email will override constitutional violations, you’re mistaking drama for due process.
This isn’t about whether someone “cares.” It’s about whether the law was followed. And in this case, it wasn’t.
RE: Here's a question.. - admin - 09-09-2025
Under Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.2, the client:
Determines the objectives of representation.
Has the final say on plea decisions, testifying, and whether to assert constitutional rights.
Must be consulted on strategy, even if the lawyer handles technical decisions.
And under Rule 1.4, your lawyer must:
Keep you reasonably informed.
Explain matters so you can make informed decisions.
Consult with you about the means used to achieve your goals.
So no, your lawyer doesn’t get to “decide everything” unilaterally. If they’re ignoring your direction, that’s not strategy—it’s a breach of duty.
RE: Here's a question.. - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-10-2025
Nope, he'll decide everything from this point forward. Remember, he can always drop you as a client if you don't follow his directions.
I bet he would get real upset if he finds you're discussing that case, you know the same shit that caused Tiffany to leave.
I'll decide when and where