+- Todd Daugherty's Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: You're fucked (/showthread.php?tid=519)
Pages:
1
2
RE: You're fucked - TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS - 08-28-2025
You keep saying it was computer generated but the discovery shows that it wasn't....
Admin Wrote:April 4th the police asked the FBI if they could go through the computers KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE!
The judge ruled they did on March 19th... So "they knew" is completely wrong and an outright lie on your part.
The District Attorney says the search warrant was valid... The record shows you gave consent and the judge made sure you understood that.
But doesn't matter because Wykoff isn't listening to a word you say, him and him alone will decide your defense. He'll make all the decisions and you have no real input.
Oh, and he showed up in Taylorville today in court, so that's another $1,000 from your retainer for simply to request evidence not be destroyed. You're going to run out of money, then as your said, you're fucked.
admin Wrote:On March 19th The police got a warrant to my internet service provider to get my mac address and my IP The issue is they SHOULD HAVE GOT THE INFORMATION FROM NOT JUST FROM MY ISP BUT THE ISP OF THE WEBSITE THE THREAT WAS POSTED ON...
Wrong again. They did get the information from that website, but requires... wait for it.. A WARRANT!!!!! A website or website provider doesn't have to or won't give out information until a search warrant is served on them. What a concept.
It took a while to get, which is very reasonable.
RE: You're fucked - admin - 08-28-2025
Quote:The judge ruled they did on March 19th... So "they knew" is completely wrong and an outright lie on your part.
The District Attorney says the search warrant was valid... The record shows you gave consent and the judge made sure you understood that.
But doesn't matter because Wykoff isn't listening to a word you say, him and him alone will decide your defense. He'll make all the decisions and you have no real input.
Oh, and he showed up in Taylorville today in court, so that's another $1,000 from your retainer for simply to request evidence not be destroyed. You're going to run out of money, then as your said, you're fucked.
YEAH BECAUSE THEAT STUPID FUCKING JUDGE WAS NOT TOLD THAT THEY DIDN'T GET ALL THE DOCUMENTS TO PROVE I WAS ON THE SITE.
RE: You're fucked - admin - 08-28-2025
Show me where they had probable cause BITCH!!!
(March 19th affidavit and warrant)
![[Image: 3.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/20251/3.jpg)
![[Image: 1.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/20251/1.jpg)
![[Image: 2.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/20251/2.jpg)
The issue IS you stupid inbred motherfucker is that they didn't have probable cause. what their fucking probable cause was the simple fact that it was my name that was on the threat and my stolen images and that's it. the issue is YOU CAN JUST USE THE CLAIM THAT THE PERSON USED THEIR NAME AND IMAGES TO POST IT HAVE TO HAVE MORE THEN JUST THAT, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!! LIKE I SAID THEY SHOULD OF DID THAT (THE WARRANT ABOVE) AT THE SAME TIME GOT THE INFORMATION FROM THE ISP OF THE WEBSITE HATE AND FLAME.....THE PROBLEM IS THEY FUCKING DIDN'T DO THAT! THE SKIPPED A STEP BECASUE THEY WERE FUCKING ARROGANT. THEY BELIEVED THAT SINCE IT WAS MY NAME, I POSTED IT. THEY ALSO BELIEVED HATE AND FLAME WAS MY WEBSIT, WHICH IT WAS NOT. THEY FINALLY GOT THE INFORMATION FROM THE HATE AND FLAME ISP AND IT SHOWED I WAS NEVER ON THAT SITE!! YOU FUCKING DUMBASS!!
RE: You're fucked - admin - 08-28-2025
The affidavit relies on name similarity alone, which is constitutionally insufficient (United States v. Vayner)
Courts have rejected warrants based on shock value alone when lacking evidentiary linkage (United States v. Weber).
This is classic character evidence masquerading as probable cause, which courts routinely reject (United States v. Rubio)
Affidavit 18-MR-37 relies on an unverified tip, a username match unsupported by forensic evidence, and inflammatory allegations that lack temporal, contextual, or technical grounding. It fails to establish probable cause, omits exculpatory statements, and relies on prejudicial character references rather than investigative rigor.
RE: You're fucked - admin - 08-28-2025
The affidavit claims the post was made by “N90GL,” which matches my HAM call sign. But name similarity alone is not enough. Courts have ruled repeatedly that digital attribution requires forensic evidence—IP logs, device fingerprints, login metadata (United States v. Vayner). On March 30th, 2018, the police got the ISP records from Hate and Flame proving I was never on the site.
RE: You're fucked - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-09-2025
No, it means you used a proxy or a VPN to get on the site, which obviously you did from the dozens of twitter and internet forum post you made from copying the site.
You said on April 2018 that the FBI told you they didn't find tor or a vpn on your computer. which of course is impossible because you didn't even know they had your computers in 2020....
So you were caught lying again.
RE: You're fucked - admin - 09-09-2025
That’s a misrepresentation of both the facts and the timeline.
Let’s clarify:
I never used a VPN or Tor to access the site in question. The FBI’s own forensic analysis—conducted after the warrant was quashed—confirmed that no VPN, Tor, or anonymizing software was present on my devices. That’s not a lie. That’s a documented fact.
Your timeline is off. The FBI took possession of my devices in April 2018, the same day the charges were dropped and the warrant was quashed. They began cataloging them immediately. So yes, I knew they had the devices—because the transfer was documented and occurred while the case was still active.
The second warrant wasn’t issued until March 2020, nearly two years later. That delay doesn’t mean I didn’t know they had the devices—it means they searched them without a valid warrant for nearly two years. That’s the constitutional violation.
Copying public posts ≠ accessing the site via VPN. Quoting or referencing content from a public forum doesn’t require a proxy, VPN, or Tor. The site didn’t require login credentials, and its content was publicly visible. That’s the whole point—it was open to impersonation and abuse.
RE: You're fucked - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-10-2025
More AI nonsense....
And you need to stop lying... In 2020, you posted you thought your computers were still on the floor at your local police and that the FBI never got them. Nor did the FBI take the devices the same day those 2018 charges were Nolle Presqui. They got them before then. Again, you need to stop the lying and lying to AI.
The FBI never told you in April 2018 that they didn't find TOR or VPN.
RE: You're fucked - admin - 09-10-2025
(09-10-2025, 12:29 AM)TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD Wrote: More AI nonsense....
And you need to stop lying... In 2020, you posted you thought your computers were still on the floor at your local police and that the FBI never got them. Nor did the FBI take the devices the same day those 2018 charges were Nolle Presqui. They got them before then. Again, you need to stop the lying and lying to AI.
The FBI never told you in April 2018 that they didn't find TOR or VPN.
BECAUSE YOU FUCKING MORON, I didn't have discovery then. I didn't lie I only knew what I knew at the time. When I got discovery I learned what really happened,
Ther charges weren't Nolle Presqui I suggest you look again
From judici.com:
04/16/2018 Motion to Dismiss filed by the State.
Order entered and filed. Case dismissed.
UNASSIGNED
04/16/2018
SA, DEF IN CUSTODY W/PD GRIGSBY. STATES MOTION TO DISMISS W/LEAVE TO REINSTATE GRANTED W/OUT OBJECTION. DEFENDANT ADVISED STATE RETAINS RIGHT TO RE-FILE AS INVESTIGATION CONTINUES. NFS.
CM
They had the right to refile...BUT THEY NEED NEW PROBABLE CAUSE TO DO THAT. that can't use the old probable cause because it was deemed invalid. The warrant was also quashed because the probable cause to search the device was the same probable cause that was deemed invalid.
The Police asked the FBI IF they could help search the devices on April 4th, the FBI didn't pick them up till April 12th on April 16 the warrant was deemed invalid as I stated above because the probable cause was deemed to be invalid. The FBI started searching the devices on April 23rd. A week after the warrant was quashed.
RE: You're fucked - TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-10-2025
No, you said the FBI told you in April 2018 that they didn't find TOR or a VPN on your computers.
Which is a lie because they never told you. I noticed you have not posted any proof they told you that. However, we do know from your screenshots from Twitch that you did indeed have Brave installed, and Brave has TOR installed. Further investigation shows that you have a verified Brave browser account.
Again, since you said the FBI told you in April 2018 that you didn't have TOR/VPN, show us proof they said that.
But we know you're lying again.
And yes, that's a Nolle Presqui in Illinois.
Quote:The Police asked the FBI IF they could help search the devices on April 4th, the FBI didn't pick them up till April 12th on April 16 the warrant
But you just said they didn't pick up the computers until the day the charges were Nolle Presqui. See how much you lie when you get into a schizo mood?
Quote:I never used a VPN or Tor to access the site in question. The FBI’s own forensic analysis—conducted after the warrant was quashed—confirmed that no VPN, Tor, or anonymizing software was present on my devices. That’s not a lie. That’s a documented fact.
Again, show us the documented proof. It never happened, and your schizophrenia is really bad right now.
Quote:Your timeline is off. The FBI took possession of my devices in April 2018, the same day the charges were dropped and the warrant was quashed.
Quote:The Police asked the FBI IF they could help search the devices on April 4th, the FBI didn't pick them up till April 12th
See how much you lie and that's in your own thread...