+- Todd Daugherty's N9OGL Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: QUESTION 4 (/showthread.php?tid=164)
Pages:
1
2
QUESTION 4 - QUESTION - 02-19-2025
Does Sheila keep an extra eye on you when you are around her and her family?????
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
Why?? they know I did nothing wrong
RE: QUESTION 4 - QUESTION - 02-19-2025
So you don't mind if I send her a copy of this to her ISP email address, will you?
Has your brother seen this document?
Do you think for a second she'll give a shit about "illegal searches"??? No, she'll know you downloaded the real thing. Along with your virtual child porn collection which I'm sure you've tried to share with her kids at some time... Or she'll think so....
![[Image: U9lCcFm.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/U9lCcFm.jpeg)
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
Oh yeah, and there a lot more to this case then that one document, but you're too arrogant to understand that you have to stick with the one document.
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
there was two warrants - a state warrant and a federal warrant that image was found under the federal warrant. The issue is:
1. The state warrant was a general warrant
2. the federal was based on the believe that the state warrant was valid, which it wasn't because again it was a general warrant
3. The federal government wanted too long to obtain the federal warrant. The feds waited too long to get the second warrant which the item you posted was found. The federal courts have ruled that waiting over 31 days to get a search warrant was unreasonable and therefore unconstitutional. They obtained the second warrant 1 year 10 months 5 days after they found the first image which was computer generated. thus, the federal warrant was unreasonable and unconstitutional...And the image in that document cannot be used for that reason
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
4. The first warrant (which was the state warrant) allowed them to seize everything on the computer. There was no need for them to look for images, but since the warrant didn't specify what they were supposed to look they went looking at all the images.
RE: QUESTION 4 - QUESTION - 02-19-2025
We're not talking about the case dipshit.... No one outside of court cares, you had child pornography on your computer...
I'll ask you again, do you mind if I send that document to Sheila at the ISP???
Has your half-brother at Argo seen the document yet??
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
Nope. I had computer generated images - where that image came from, I do not know. Computer generated images are legal.
RE: QUESTION 4 - admin - 02-19-2025
he's not my half-brother dipshit, and this has NOTHING to do with them. I never see them, they live in Chicago and I live 3 hours away.
RE: QUESTION 4 - QUESTION - 02-20-2025
They know better to stay away from you
Funny how successful he is and what a failure you are.
He can drive his car(s) anytime he wants where ever he wants... He can buy a trike if he wants to...
You have to ask Mommy to borrow the car.. Your Mommy wouldn't let you buy a trike..
AT AGE 57!!!!!! WHAT A LOOOOSSER!!!!