+- Todd Daugherty's Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: KEY point (/showthread.php?tid=317)
KEY point - admin - 05-19-2025
The Charge is one count for one image that the state is claiming is child porn. Agent O'Sullivan who is the FBI forensic expert claimed it was computer-generated.
In Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (which I was somewhat part of) the US Supreme Court in 2002 ruled that computer-generated images were not only legal but constitutional protected speech.
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition | Oyez
In 2003 the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that virtual images including computer-generated images was legal and constitutional protected speech.
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER (2003) | FindLaw