+- Todd Daugherty's N9OGL Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Something to remember (/showthread.php?tid=32)
Something to remember - admin - 12-18-2024
“The major, overriding problem with the description of the object of the search—“any or all files”—is that the police did not have probable cause to believe that everything on the phone was evidence of the crime of public indecency.” United States v. Winn, 79 F. Supp. 3d 904, 919 (S.D. Ill. 2015)
RE: Something to remember - admin - 12-18-2024
The Supreme Court put the scope of such a wholesale seizure in perspective by explaining that it “would typically expose the government to far more than the most exhaustive search of a house.” Riley v. California, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2491, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014) (emphasis in original).
United States v. Winn, 79 F. Supp. 3d 904, 919 (S.D. Ill. 2015)
RE: Something to remember - Guest - 12-19-2024
You're going to prison so get it out of your system now
RE: Something to remember - admin - 12-19-2024
Like I said before, prove it
RE: Something to remember - admin - 12-19-2024
well ... I am waiting.
It shows how stupid these people are because they come on here and make a statement and can explain themselves.
FYI I am not going to jail, not over a GENERAL WARRANT.
RE: Something to remember - admin - 12-19-2024
I mean I can't see a court allow a general search warrant, after all they are unconstitutional, and it's been well established by the courts that they are unconstitutional. (Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927) all the way to (Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)