+- Todd Daugherty's Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: EIGHT YEARS (/showthread.php?tid=452)
EIGHT YEARS - admin - 07-12-2025
This case has been going on for eight years. It began in 2018 and according to the state of Illinois the charges were never really dismissed, and the warrant was never really quashed. instead, the state dropped the charges while they continued their investigation to where we are now.
I AM SUING THE TAYLORVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THE FBI
I don't think 35 million is enough for 8 years of Duration of Harm, Multi-Agency Misconduct, Constitutional Violations, Emotional & Psychological Toll, Opportunity Cost. So, I'm now looking around 50 to 75 million dollars.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - N9OGL REPEAT BOT - 07-12-2025
Your not good at math as I can see. 2018 wasn't 8 years ago.
The charges in 2018 weren't really dismissed, they were Nolle Presqui and the judge informed you of that at the time which you acknowledged. Only the arrest warrant was quashed as two District Attorney's have confirmed. And the judge in 2018 made it very clear to you that the investigation could continue.
Not counting the Statute of Limitations as expired for almost all of that and you can only sue for real, actual damages, which in your case is none as you did not hold employment in 2018, nor lose residency, or any government benefits. You also claim to not be under psychiatric care which means no provable emotional and psychological toll from the case, you already suffered from those problems previously.
I suggest your father get an attorney and work on your case rather than acting out on a message forum.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER - 07-12-2025
Eight years is probably what your facing in prison. Get over it fat boy.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - admin - 07-12-2025
Let’s correct your misstatements with facts—not assumptions.
- The case was dismissed, not nolle prosequi. The State’s Attorney filed a formal motion to dismiss, which the judge granted. That’s not a pause—it’s a termination. Your claim that it was “nolle prosequi” is factually wrong, and I have the court documents to prove it.
- The arrest warrant was quashed, and the dismissal was based on lack of evidence. The search yielded nothing, and the website in question allowed anonymous posts—undermining the entire premise of the charges.
- The judge’s comment about continued investigation doesn’t override the dismissal. It acknowledged the state’s intent, not its legal authority. Eight years later, no new charges have been filed—because there’s no case.
- Statute of limitations arguments fail when the harm is ongoing. If the state and federal agencies continue to act as if the case is active, then the clock hasn’t stopped ticking—it’s still running.
- Damages aren’t limited to employment or benefits. Emotional distress, reputational harm, and constitutional violations are compensable. And no, preexisting conditions don’t cancel out new trauma. That’s not how civil rights law works.
- I’m not acting out—I’m acting legally. I’m documenting misconduct, building a case, and preparing to hold every responsible party accountable. If that makes you uncomfortable, it’s because the truth is finally catching up.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - admin - 07-12-2025
maybe this can help you out, because it was dismissed not Nolle Prosequi:
![[Image: 7.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/7.jpg)
![[Image: 8.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/8.jpg)
RE: EIGHT YEARS - N9OGL REPEAT BOT - 07-12-2025
I think the District Attorney knows more than you. Repeating yourself 100s of times over doesn't change the fact.
Read #6 plus the judge told you the investigation was continuing. Also the case was Nolle Presqui which is not a Dismissal with Prejudice.
Your father should have hired you a real attorney
RE: EIGHT YEARS - admin - 07-12-2025
Actually, I’ve read #6—and the rest of the court record. That’s why I know the difference between nolle prosequi and a formal dismissal. The State’s Attorney filed a Motion to Dismiss, which was granted by the judge. That’s not speculation—it’s documented.
The warrant was quashed, the charges were dismissed, and the forensic evidence contradicted the basis of the case. If the investigation continued, it did so without legal foundation—which is exactly why this has become a civil rights issue.
Repeating falsehoods doesn’t make them true. And appealing to authority—whether it’s the District Attorney or your opinion of my legal representation—doesn’t override the facts. I’m not here to win a popularity contest. I’m here to win a case.
If you’re uncomfortable with that, I suggest you read the dismissal order again. Carefully this time.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - N9OGL REPEAT BOT - 07-14-2025
Toad posting via AI again which means immediately ignored.
Your not posting all the documents. You posted the transcript, in which the judge made it very clear to you that the charges could be refiled against you and the investigation could continue.
And also dismissed without prejudice.
SA, DEF IN CUSTODY W/PD GRIGSBY. STATES MOTION TO DISMISS W/LEAVE TO REINSTATE GRANTED W/OUT OBJECTION. DEFENDANT ADVISED STATE RETAINS RIGHT TO RE-FILE AS INVESTIGATION CONTINUES. NFS.
I ALSO SUGGEST YOU AND YOUR FATHER ACTUALLY COOPERATE WITH YOUR LAWYER RATHER THAN TRY TO WIN AN INTERNET.
I'M SURE YOUR NEW LAWYER WILL TELL YOU TO STOP BLABBING ABOUT THE CASE BUT YOU WON'T LISTEN. I WOULD SUCK TO LOSE YOUR NEW LAWYER JUST DAYS BEFORE A MAJOR HEARING.
RE: EIGHT YEARS - admin - 07-14-2025
Yes, the charges were dismissed without prejudice—which means the State retains the right to refile. That’s not in dispute. What is in dispute is the legitimacy of the investigation, the validity of the evidence, and the constitutional violations that have occurred since day one.
Let’s break it down:
- The dismissal with leave to reinstate was granted while I was in custody, based on an investigation that had already been compromised by false warrant affidavits, unlawful searches, and misuse of seized property.
- The transcript confirms that the judge acknowledged the State’s right to refile—but it does not validate the underlying misconduct.
- The fact that the investigation continues after the warrant was quashed, and after the FBI accessed the devices without legal authority, only strengthens my case for suppression and civil rights violations.
- Posting documents selectively doesn’t change the fact that the timeline exposes a pattern of abuse—from the baseless arrest in 2018 to the procedural delays in 2025.