I have a lot of comments on this I'll start with this one 18 USC 1466A was deemed unconstitutional as you stated in UNITED STATES v. HANDLEY (2008) he was thrown in jail as you stated for receiving obscene material and not child porn. 18 USC 1466A was deemed unconstitutional again just this year UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN ANDEREGG, (2025) because 18 USC 1466 made possession of obscene material (including AI) illegal. The court ruled a person has the right to look at obscene material in the privacy of their home citing Stanley v Georgia (1969) including AI material that is indistinguishable. it's only illegal to distribute.
Dwight Whorley wasn't at a library he was at a government employment agency; people also tend to fail to mention that Mr. Whorley was on parole for CP he wasn't supposed to have the stuff real or not to begin with it was a violated his parole. it is illegal to transport obscene material over interstate commerce, the federal government has sole jurisdiction over interstate commerce. Article I section 8 clause 3. States can only regulate intrastate commerce.
The Miller test as you stated is a three-prong test. for something to be obscene it has to be all three prongs not just one. where some of these law like the PROTECT ACT and the Texas law are unconstitutional because they only require one prong of the miller test. As for using just one line in a book to claim it obscene the court ruled in the 1950 and 60's that the work must be taken as whole, you just can use one line or image. Whorley judge was wrong.
Dwight Whorley wasn't at a library he was at a government employment agency; people also tend to fail to mention that Mr. Whorley was on parole for CP he wasn't supposed to have the stuff real or not to begin with it was a violated his parole. it is illegal to transport obscene material over interstate commerce, the federal government has sole jurisdiction over interstate commerce. Article I section 8 clause 3. States can only regulate intrastate commerce.
The Miller test as you stated is a three-prong test. for something to be obscene it has to be all three prongs not just one. where some of these law like the PROTECT ACT and the Texas law are unconstitutional because they only require one prong of the miller test. As for using just one line in a book to claim it obscene the court ruled in the 1950 and 60's that the work must be taken as whole, you just can use one line or image. Whorley judge was wrong.