How stupid are they??

[admin]

Nope, I have a static IP address I always have. We have high speed fiber optic internet 1gb up and 1 gb down is the speed, and my IP address is fixed. Second documents from the ISP of the website hate and flame, provide by their lawyer showed that I was never on that site period. 




DNS stands for Domain Name Service, which is for websites. The police were and still are under the impression that the Hate and Flame website belong to be. This however is NOT true, I had nothing to do with that site. In fact, when they came to my house on March 17th in 2018, they stated they wanted to talk to me about something that I posted on my website Hate and Flame. I informed them that night that the site hate and flame was NOT my site. This was later confirmed on March 30th, 2018

[admin]

Actually, no they can't the US Supreme Court curtailed the "wholesale seizure of every piece of data on a digital device" (Riley v California 2014) These morons also believe that only applies in California, no it doesn't Riley v California  was a US Supreme Court that was actually two cases combined together one was in California (9th Circuit) and the other was from the 1st Circuit. In the 7th district where I am located. The US Courts has also stated that they cannot seize every piece of data and that they must particularize what data is to be seized citing Riley. The warrant can't list everything, that unconstitutional and it makes the warrant a general warrant. See  United States v. Ganias (2014), United States v. Winn (2015), and United States v. Morton (2021) reinforce this principle: law enforcement cannot seize or examine all digital content unless they have probable cause for each category of data. By the way, just because a judge signs the warrant doesn't mean that it valid, that why we Franks Hearing. It could also mean that the judge rubber stamped the warrant would looking through it.