THANKS TOAD FOR POSTING THIS AND IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY

[IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY]

Great job by HSI and thanks to you for publishing this confidential document.

---

And confirmed by another agency, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Thanks again for releasing documents from your case that the public would never have seen.

---

More.. That makes 4 agencies that confirmed it was child porn.. HSI, NCIC, FBI and ISP

[admin]

That was the Illinois State police dumbass read the header.



The question was also a STATE POLICE OFFICER comments before a judge...DUMBASS. not homeland security or the FBI....DUMBASS!

[admin]

According to the FBI agent who was the forensic analyst it was computer generated. Where the real image came from, we do not know.

still don't matter the warrant was quashed.

[admin]

That is a state police report, not homeland security or the FBI

[IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY]

According to the FBI agent who was the forensic analyst it was computer generated. Where the real image came from, we do not know.

still don't matter the warrant was quashed.

Show us the proof that was said. I think you are just imaging that with your schizophrenic mind.

The search warrant wasn't quashed, the child porn was found prior to the FBI being notified the charges were dismissed without prejudice, then add the judge said the investigation could continue and you never filed for your computers back during that time.

Again, show us the proof you asked for the computers back before they found the child porn.

And remember, the internet doesn't care, you're branded forever.

---

Can you not understand what this mean??

Please tell me what this means in your own words

Show us the HSI affidavit, I know you have it.

[admin]

Let’s deal in facts—not projection, defamation, or amateur psychoanalysis.

1. The search warrant was quashed.
   On April 16, 2018, the court issued an order invalidating the warrant. The FBI’s subsequent search on April 23, 2018 was conducted under a void instrument. That’s not just improper—it’s unconstitutional. You can deny it all you want, but the court record doesn’t lie.
   
2. The claim that “child porn was found prior to the FBI being notified” is false and defamatory.
   No such material was ever lawfully discovered, and any alleged findings stem from an illegal search. You’re parroting a narrative built on procedural misconduct and judicial manipulation. If you have proof, show it. Otherwise, you’re just amplifying libel.
   
3. I did request the return of my property.
   Multiple times. The fact that the State ignored those requests doesn’t mean they didn’t happen. And even if I hadn’t, the government has an affirmative duty to return unlawfully seized property. Silence does not equal consent.
   
4. The judge’s comment that “the investigation could continue” does not override the Fourth Amendment.
   Judicial permission to investigate is not a license to violate constitutional protections. The warrant was quashed. Period. Any continued search or seizure after that point is illegal.
   
5. As for your attempt to brand me—save it.
   The internet doesn’t care about truth until someone forces it to. That’s exactly what I’m doing. I’ve built a public record, exposed misconduct, and backed my defense with national-level legal expertise. You can try to smear me, but you’re not the final word—I am.
   

      6. There is NO HSI Affidavit, sorry to break it to you.

[IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY]

Nope. More AI deflection. Now answer, what does this mean?

---

According to the FBI agent who was the forensic analyst it was computer generated.

Still waiting for you to produce this evidence..... Until you do, we can assume you are lying.

[admin]

On April 16, 2018, the court issued an order invalidating the warrant. The FBI’s subsequent search on April 23, 2018, was conducted under a void instrument. That’s not just improper—it’s unconstitutional. You can deny it all you want, but the court record doesn’t lie

In other words, the state should have told the FBI that the warrant was quashed but they didn't. Secondly The FBI didn't find it until after the warrant was quashed. The FBI received the computers on April 11th, but they didn't go through them until April 23rd. They sat in storage for 13 days before they were even gone through, actually less than that because they indexed them on the 16th.

The judge’s comment that “the investigation could continue” does not override the Fourth Amendment. Just because the judge says they can continue the investigation doesn't mean they can go through the computers without probable cause. They have probable cause to go through a computer, and they lost their original probable cause, that why it was dismissed.

[IT NEVER EVER GOES AWAY]

I'll ask one more time and if you just keep deflecting, I'll just go back to dick pics and other shit..... And I'll declare it another WIN for me.

I'm giving you a chance to prove your arguments and a chance to debate. But if you want to deflect, rant, and rage, show no evidence of your statements, then there is no debate to be  had... So stay focused... Ready????

So again for the last time....

Now answer, what does this mean?



And prove your statement below... Show us where the FBI forensic analyst said it was computer generated

According to the FBI agent who was the forensic analyst it was computer generated.

[admin]

1 I don't have it scanned

2 your not part of this fucking case