How am I going to jail??

[admin]

And all kinds of school activities happen on Friday afternoon and nights...

Immanent threat and probable cause. But doesn't matter because you consented to the computer searches when you got released in April 2018.

Those teens on that youtube video are heroes. Because of them, we know for certain you are a pedophile who downloads child pornography.

Maybe if you didn't lie to the police and continue to make threats on Twitter, who knows..... Oh well,  you know it all.

Nope, NOR does it give the police an excuse not to investigate, which they didn't - THEY DID NO INVESTIGATION because in their minds that was a threat that was my name and therefore a reasonable person would believe I did it. I didn't do it, and they had evidence to prove I didn't do it. Again, No I didn't not give them consent show me exactly where it states that I gave them consent to search my computers. 

I made no threat toward twitter. vague comments and comments that are hyperbole are not consider threats (US SUPREME COURT 1969) The US Supreme Court has also stated that the government must use a selective standard with a mens rea (Elonis v United States 2015 and Counterman v Colorado 2022) Police are not allowed to use a reasonable person standard. 

A mens rea ~ In criminal law, mens rea (/ˈmɛnz ˈreɪə/; Law Latin for "guilty mind") is the mental state of a defendant who is accused of committing a crime. In common law jurisdictions, most crimes require proof both of mens rea and actus reus ("guilty act") before the defendant can be found guilty.

The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty". As a general rule, someone who acted without mental fault is not liable in criminal law. Exceptions are known as strict liability crimes. Moreover, when a person intends a harm, but as a result of bad aim or other cause the intent is transferred from an intended victim to an unintended victim, the case is considered to be a matter of transferred intent.

[Guest]

They did do an investigation as the court records you posted show. They don't have any evidence that you didn't do it, all they said is they didn't have anything to implicate you "at this time". That is not the same as "you didn't do it". You gave consent to the investigation and search to continue in your April 2018 hearing. The judge even asked if you understood. You said yes.

Obviously the twitter threats were proof of mens rea along with you very well documented past history of making threats and your confessions to making them both in writing on your own and in your plea bargain agreement.

Now, did you do it? I think you probably did or those teens on youtube did it. And because you didn't follow my advice to hire a real lawyer, I guess we'll never know if those teens did it or not. Oh well.......

But the bottom line is you are a child pornographer, you had child pornography on your computer, and everyone knows it.

it never goes away, never, ever!!!!

[admin]

They did do an investigation as the court records you posted show. They don't have any evidence that you didn't do it, all they said is they didn't have anything to implicate you "at this time". That is not the same as "you didn't do it". You gave consent to the investigation and search to continue in your April 2018 hearing. The judge even asked if you understood. You said yes.

Obviously the twitter threats were proof of mens rea along with you very well documented past history of making threats and your confessions to making them both in writing on your own and in your plea bargain agreement.

Now, did you do it? I think you probably did or those teens on youtube did it. And because you didn't follow my advice to hire a real lawyer, I guess we'll never know if those teens did it or not. Oh well.......

But the bottom line is you are a child pornographer, you had child pornography on your computer, and everyone knows it. 

it never goes away, never, ever!!!!

No, they didn't and what court records are you claiming. They had more evidence that what was originally stated some materials I didn't see until this motion to suppress, they were trying to save face for the FUCK UP they did, and they did FUCK UP! 

NO WHERE did I state that I consented to a search, and with evidence they did have (more than what was originally known) they couldn't prove it was me beyond a reasonable doubt, hell they didn't even have probable cause. The police fucked up; it was one fuck up after another causing a bigger fuck up. I never confessed to making threats, I did admit to harassment (a class B misdemeanor) which is nothing more than a petty crime. 
twitter was never brought up, and no that was mens rea. I suggest you read a few court cases including Elonis v United States and Counterman v Colorado. 

Elonis v. United States is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a conviction for threatening another person on social media requires proof of subjective intent to threaten

Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable as crimes and free speech protected by the First Amendment. The states and lower courts were divided over how to define the line. By a 7-2 majority, the court decided that statements are not free speech if the defendant recklessly disregarded a substantial risk that their statements would be viewed as threatening violence.

I don't who those guys on Youtube were, nor is it my job to know or my lawyers, it the police's job. IF YOU WANT TO BE A COP DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!! PART OF YOUR JOB IS TO INVESTIGATE, NOT HALF-ASS IT. The police in this town don't want to do their fucking job instead they got fucking judges rubber stamping them warrants like fucking Christmas every day. HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE DO YOU THINK ARE IN JAIL BECAUSE THE POLICE DID DO THEIR FUCKING JOB!?!? 

They got an anonymous tip from the FBI, their job is to corroborate the tip before even making a fuck arrest...THAT HAS BEEN THE FUCKING STANDARD SINCE THE 1980'S US SUPREME COURT CASE OF ILLINOIS V GATES!! THE US SUPREME COURT HAS FUCKING STATED THAT THEY FUCKING HAVE TO DO IT!!

The police received an anonymous tip that the Gates were going to Florida to pick up car filled with drugs and drive them back to Illinois. The police did go and arrest the fucking Gates the police investigated prior the arrest. they corroborated the tip before making the arrest. There are other cases (recent cases) which the courts have state the police must corroborate an anonymous tip. 


NOPE didn't have child porn on my computer, had computer - generated images also known as virtual child porn which is LEGAL!!!!! AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTED SPEECH

[admin]

again, it doesn't save them from the fact that the warrant was a general warrant.

[admin]

they still don't get saved because the warrant was a general warrant. The warrant allowed them to seize everything in the 15 items they took, including all documents. photos, files, text files, emails, email passwords and other passwords. browser history, all my movies, music and other files any medical and personal information. The warrant didn't stop them from seizing everything. It basically allowed them to seize everything, and it states:

"Any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2; any and all magnetic or optical media, including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVDs, USB devices, and any and all passwords or other computer security devices, and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or on media capable of being read by a computer or with the aid of computer equipment, any and all computer software, any and all evidence, data or information pertaining to the possession including but not limited to: any and all evidence of dominion and control over the computer, specifically, but not limited to, a computer possessing MAC address "EC:4F:82:29:B4:03" or IP address "72.9.123.215"; peer to peer file trading software; any and all information pertaining to dates and times of access to the computer; any and all information pertaining to internet searches pertaining to posts regarding threats of violence directed towards schools or public officials; records and other items which evidence ownership or use of computer equipment found in the above residence; including but not limited to sales receipts, bills for internet access and handwritten notes, records evidencing occupancy or ownership of the premises described above including but not limited to utility and telephone bills, mail envelopes or address correspondence. This search warrant shall include authority to analyze and search any magnetic or optical media seized for relevant evidence as outlined in this search warrant, and the property described herein, when found, shall be inventoried and a return of all instruments, articles or things seized shall be made without unnecessary delay."

FYI 720 ILCS5/16D-2 was repealed back in 2013, BUT again it allowed of seizure of all the materials on those 15 devices.

CRIMINAL OFFENSES
(720 ILCS 5/) Criminal Code of 2012.
(720 ILCS 5/Art. 16D heading)
ARTICLE 16D.
COMPUTER CRIME
(Source: Repealed by P.A. 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)


https://witnessslips.ilga.gov/legislatio...d=45900000

[admin]

here let me break it down for you.

They received a threat against a school, the next day they came to my house, and I told them I didn't do it, they then arrested me. two days after that they got my IP address from my internet service provider and two days after that using my IP got a warrant to search and seize my computers. Seven days after that they got the information from the ISP and lawyer of the hate and flame which showed I wasn't even on the site. this is not the way they should have done it.
The proper procedure under Illinois v Gates would have been they got the threat, and come to my house and talk and if I told them I didn't do they then could either say ok or hold me for a few days while they got my IP address and at the same time the information from the ISP from the hate and flame and confirm there is a LINK between the threat and my computer. If there is no LINK than they have to let me go.

There has to be a LINK between my computer and the threat, I told them I didn't post the threat and twelve days later due to their lack of understanding how the fucking internet works it was confirmed by the ISP and Lawyer for the ISP of the Hate and Flame website, that I had not been on that site and there was NO LINK between the threat and my computer. If they would have got the information from the start, I wouldn't have spent a month in jail and NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING. So NOW they are going to get sued.

[admin]

AGAIN there has to be a LINK between the threat and the person's computer. Basing it off what you see on the screen doesn't work you have to show more than that including IP address as a link. But what they did, they based it on a screenshot that they had received and only that, there was IP address attached to show there was a link or any IP address at all. So the police based it on that saw which was the threat itself.  You can't do that!

[admin]

Oh, and the police don't get qualified immunity. For the police to not get qualified immunity it must be shown that: 1. they violated a constitutional or statutory right and 2. that constitutional or statutory right has been well established by the courts. General warrants are unconstitutional and violate the fourth amendment and it has been well established by the US Supreme Court since 1927 that General warrants are unconstitutional

[admin]

Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/275/192/

Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/540/551/

[admin]

And all kinds of school activities happen on Friday afternoon and nights...

 

Not at an elementary school in Taylorville dumb fuck, maybe the junior high or high school, but not elementary.  BTW the post was made on a Friday, I was arrested on Saturday. A post which again didn't have my IP address on it, because like I said I didn't post it.