Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The one main thing
#1
The one main thing people can't dispute:

1. The police arrested me based solely on an unverified tip.

2. They did not corroborate the tip with IP records, website logs, or forensic evidence.

3. No interviews, no digital analysis—just a hunch.

4. The arrest and search warrant were issued without any factual basis.

5. The affidavit relied on assumptions, not evidence.

6. The threat was posted anonymously on a site that doesn’t require login and is known for impersonation.

7. The affiant had only one year of experience as a police officer.

8.  He had no documented training in internet investigations or digital identity verification.

9.  He was not qualified to interpret or present digital evidence.

10. It failed to meet the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement.

11. It authorized seizure of all computers and “any and all files”, without specifying what evidence was sought.

12. There was no nexus between my devices and the alleged threat.

13. The judge was never told that:

• The website allowed anonymous posting and impersonation.

• The post came from a TOR exit node, not my IP.

• Multiple individuals reported ongoing threats under my name after I was jailed.

14. The state dropped charges, acknowledging lack of probable cause.

15.  The judge explicitly ordered: “ANY warrants or summons previously issued are hereby quashed.”

16. One week after charges were dropped, the FBI searched my computers without a warrant.

17. This violates Riley v. California (2014), which requires a valid warrant to search digital devices.

18.  After allegedly finding an image, the FBI paused and waited 2½ years to obtain a second warrant.

19. This delay is unreasonable and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment and violates standards of prompt judicial oversight.

20. FBI failed to disclose to the federal judge:

1.  That the original warrant was quashed.

2.  That the image was computer-generated, not illegal content.

3. That the image was found during an illegal, warrantless search.

4.  That the state had dropped charges and no longer had probable cause.


COME ON PROVE THIS WRONG....THESE PEOPLE THAT COME ON HERE CAN'T..


THAT IS WHY I AM SUING THE CITY, STATE AND FBI FOR 50 MILLION DOLLARS FOR 

1. Reputational destruction

2. Emotional distress

3. Economic harm (past and future)

4. Malicious Prosecution

• Continued legal action without probable cause.

• Ignoring exculpatory evidence.

• Federal declination confirms lack of merit.

5. Abuse of Process

• Misuse of warrants, hearings, and judicial procedures to harass and intimidate.

• Attempted retroactive justification of illegal searches.

6. Violation of Fourth Amendment Rights

• Unlawful arrest.

• General warrant.

• Warrantless search of digital devices.

• Use of tainted evidence.

7. Violation of Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process)

• Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence (Brady violation).

• Deprivation of liberty without legal basis.

8. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

• Prolonged harassment.

• Public defamation.

• Psychological trauma from false accusations and incarceration.

9. Loss of Livelihood and Career Opportunities

• Damage to professional reputation.

• Loss of income, clients, and future contracts.

• Inability to rebuild due to ongoing stigma.

10. Loss of Personal Relationships

• Isolation due to public defamation.

• Breakdown of family, social, and professional networks.

11. Violation of First Amendment Rights

• Retaliation for speech and online expression.

• Targeting based on digital identity and advocacy.

12. Negligent Supervision and Training

• Agencies failed to train officers in digital forensics and constitutional procedure.

• Supervisors allowed misconduct to continue unchecked.


This lawsuit is not just about compensation—it’s about accountability. The City of Taylorville, the State of Illinois, and the FBI conspired—through negligence, deception, and unconstitutional conduct—to destroy my reputation, violate my rights, and derail my life. I seek $50 million in damages not only for what they took, but for what they tried to erase: my name, my future, and my truth.
Reply
#2
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS9Gaa4uG0SRYRQ8L-G2vI...91UIT-Pg&s]
Reply
#3
(Yesterday, 10:04 PM)mars Wrote: [Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS9Gaa4uG0SRYRQ8L-G2vI...91UIT-Pg&s]

Sorry to hear that you're fucking RETARDED
Reply
#4
I mean, if you can't read your either stupid or retarded.
Reply
#5
You're the one who was in retarded education in high school, not me. Without reading it, it's the same shit every day, blah blah blah, I'm going to sue (but too cowardly to even send out an Intent better, which has long long expired).

No need to read. And neither is anyone else, including your lawyer. He's in control, not you.

[Image: giphy.gif]

And more dick porn to keep this site NFSW on the search engines.
Reply
#6
No, because the violation is occurring therefore the clock haven't started
Reply
#7
No Toad, it's not and it's been explained multiple times to you by over a dozen people. You just go into retard mode and rationalize.

you're getting nervous again.

Dick porn to keep this site as NFSW and before you can delete, it'll be archived by the search engines to label as such.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)