How am I going to jail??

[admin]

The fact is, I didn't make the threat, the police failed to corroborate the anonymous tip, instead they employed an old standard, which the US Supreme court stated they aren't allowed to use, all this because the police didn't have the intelligence to understand how the internet works. They got a judge to rubber stamp a general search warrant that didn't limit the scope of the search or seizure, and when the charges were dismissed, they hand it over to the FBI who DID HAVE TO FUCKING INTELLIGENCE TO SEE IF THE WARRANT WAS VALID OR NOT!! Instead, they ran with the general search warrant to used it to search for pretty much anything. When they found a computer-generated image, the special agent (not the forensic analyst) went to the federal courts claiming 1. they had the computers from a valid state warrant (GENERAL SEARCH WARRANTS ARE NOT VALID YOU STUPID FBI SON OF A BITCHES) When the AUSA refused to take the case, the SAME RETARDED FUCKING FBI AGENT WENT TO THE STATE WITH WHAT THEY FOUND UNDER THAT GENERAL SEARCH WARRANT

[admin]

I mean look:





If that isn't a general search warrant, I don't know what is. What I don't understand why you have a state wanting to fight it and a US government agency (FBI) supporting something that was hated by the colonist for years. General warrants and writs of assist are illegal and have been since the founding of the US. So, why do you have a state wanting to fight it, and a US government agency helping them in their illegal search.

[admin]

Because none of those 5 things you mentioned are not true plus you consented to the search continuing in April 2018. That's why the warrant was quashed as they needed to no longer seize any more computer devices. Did you notice the judge never ordered the items to be returned to you, and you didn't ask until at least 2021.

Oh, you'll see.... You said the same thing in 2015 and 2018..... 2026 is coming.

The issue is, even the warrant wasn't quashed, the warrant was a general warrant WHICH IS ILLEGAL!!!!

[admin]

Another issue is the Judge was not detached. The Judge the signed the general search warrant, was also the same judge that heard the case. So, there is an issue there.

[admin]

BTW SHIT STAIN POLICE AND STATE ...

I'M GOING TO DESTROY YOUR CHILD PORN LAW ... YOU WANT TO GO AFTER ME FOR VIRTUAL IMAGES ... I WILL SHUT THIS SHIT SHOW DOWN

Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal...on-1961047

People of the State of Illinois v Kenneth Alexander

https://law.justia.com/cases/illinois/su...93952.html

[admin]

Because none of those 5 things you mentioned are not true plus you consented to the search continuing in April 2018. That's why the warrant was quashed as they needed to no longer seize any more computer devices. Did you notice the judge never ordered the items to be returned to you, and you didn't ask until at least 2021.

Oh, you'll see.... You said the same thing in 2015 and 2018..... 2026 is coming.

These people cannot even prove what they are saying. instead, they post bull like they posted above. but let me break it down ...

Because none of those 5 things you mentioned are not true

Nope it is true, and it can be proven by documents from the police, the FBI and the state. The documents are from NOTHING I have said. they are documents that come from discovery which both me, my lawyer and the state has. 

plus you consented to the search continuing in April 2018.

Nope there is no document that states that. The judge allowed the state to continue investigating it, however by that time, they had enough to show that I didn't do it. BTW the state attorney at the time had evidence that my lawyer back then didn't even know he had, let alone the judge. he left a lot of information out. The state was well aware that my IP was not on that threat, and they were also aware of stuff that wasn't mentioned in the 2018 case.

That's why the warrant was quashed as they needed to no longer seize any more computer devices.

No, the motion doesn't state that, if that was case, they would have stated that. when it says Any warrant previously issued is hereby quashed, it means the warrants are quashed and anything seized by them can no longer be searched legally. If they are search it becomes a warrantless search and the US Supreme Court in Riley v California ruled a warrantless search of electronic devices is unconstitutional. 

Did you notice the judge never ordered the items to be returned to you, and you didn't ask until at least 2021.

No, I asked for their return LONG BEFORE 2021.

[admin]

IN OTHER WORDS SHIT STAIN, THE STATE WITHHELD INFORMATION FROM BOTH MY LAWYER AND THE JUDGE BACK IN 2018!!

THEY TRIED TO WITHHOLD EVIDENCE THIS TIME AS WELL.....

[admin]

How does it feel to be age 56 and you are still completely dependent on your parents for everything and you would be in jail STILL without them bailing you out.

how's it feel that no one gives a shit about you. Any fucking scumbag that comes on someone website and harasses them day and night is nothing more than a piece of shit.

[admin]

They did do an investigation as the court records you posted show. They don't have any evidence that you didn't do it, all they said is they didn't have anything to implicate you "at this time". That is not the same as "you didn't do it". You gave consent to the investigation and search to continue in your April 2018 hearing. The judge even asked if you understood. You said yes.

AGAIN I want to point this out, THE STATE ATTORNEY AT THE TIME WITHHELD A LOT OF INFORMATION, IN FACT WE DIDN'T EVEN GET TO SEE DISCOVERY. If we were to see discovery back in 2018, NONE OF THIS SHIT WOULD BE HAPPENING

[Guest]

YOU'RE GOING TO BE SOMEONE'S PRISON BITCH