Another thing Officer (now Sgt) Nelson didn't mention in the search warrant

[TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS]

That you were convicted in 2010 for threatening to blow up your local cable/telephone company with a pipe bomb with a full written confession.

Or that you were found guilty of Violation of Probation in 2012 and got physically violent and had to be restrained.

Funny how you don't complain about that not being mentioned in the search warrant.

[admin]

Let’s stay focused on the case at hand.

The 2010 conviction and 2012 probation violation were fully adjudicated over a decade ago. They’re not relevant to the 2018 warrant unless the affidavit explicitly relied on them—which it didn’t. And if it had, it would’ve needed to show how those events were materially connected to the alleged threat. It didn’t. Because they weren’t.

The warrant was issued based on an anonymous post from a site that allowed impersonation. The post continued while I was incarcerated. The website confirmed I never accessed it. The forensic search found nothing. And the warrant was quashed.
So, no—I’m not ‘complaining’ about what wasn’t mentioned. I’m exposing what was falsely assumed, what was omitted, and what was ignored. That’s the difference between a criminal record and a constitutional violation. And I’m not on trial for my past—I’m holding the system accountable for its present.”

[TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS]

You are the one confused.

The judge ruled probable cause. Your lawyer could debated that at the time, just like how they did in 2015...

The search has nothing to do with mentioning guilt or innocence. All he mentioned is your PD was aware of you and your past...

Oh by the way, Mr Wykoff made another appearance today, and of course that means another $1,000 off your retainer, you're going to run out of money real soon, even at $12,500... As you said, you're fucked and I agree.

---

The warrant was issued based on an anonymous post from a site that allowed impersonation.

Again, that was not a fact when the judge ruled probable cause on March 19th nor mentioned by you or your lawyer in court... DING DING

In fact, you were not cleared at all.... All they said is someone else COULD have done it.

[admin]

That you were convicted in 2010 for threatening to blow up your local cable/telephone company with a pipe bomb with a full written confession.

Or that you were found guilty of Violation of Probation in 2012 and got physically violent and had to be restrained.

Funny how you don't complain about that not being mentioned in the search warrant.

That has nothing to do with case. The case in 2010 is long done and over with

[TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD]

the 2010 and 2012 conviction will always be on your record, you will always be a convicted criminal. It can be 50 years from now, doesn't change the fact you are a convicted criminal, twice in fact. I'm sure when the judge set bail in 2018 and 2022, he used that against you.

[admin]

I was never convinced in 2012 you need to know how the court system works

[TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD]

Nope, convicted in 2012 and you plead guilty... You even got violent around Mrs Kindermann.

Never, ever goes away shorty.

[admin]

Let’s get the record straight.

Yes, there was a negotiated plea in 2012 related to a Class B misdemeanor from 2010. That’s not a felony, not a violent conviction, and not relevant to the current case. The plea included non-electronic home confinement, and the probation was terminated unsuccessfully—which simply means I didn’t complete the full term, not that I was convicted of a new offense.

There’s no conviction for violence, and no documented incident involving Mrs. Kindermann that supports that claim. If someone wants to allege misconduct, they need to cite actual court records—not gossip or innuendo.

Also, let’s be clear: a misdemeanor from 2010 doesn’t justify an unlawful arrest in 2018, nor does it excuse the unconstitutional search and seizure of my property after the warrant was quashed. Trying to dredge up unrelated history is a distraction tactic—and it doesn’t change the fact that the current case collapsed under its own weight.

If you want to debate facts, bring court-certified documents. Otherwise, you’re just throwing mud.

BTW the law I was arrested for back then was later repealed.

[TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD]

You're lying again and using AI again. The court records proves you got violent around Mrs. Kindermann and had to be restrained.

02/27/2012 DEFT, SA. PD APPOINTED SUBJECT TO REIMBURSEMENT. CCPD ADVISES DEFT BECAME PHYSICALLY VIOLENT AND HAD TO BE RESTRAINED. DEFT ADMONISHED. PD APPOINTED 3/23/12 @ 10 A.M.

And it never, ever goes away. For the rest of your life, you are a convicted violent criminal.

[admin]

Nope, that is incorrect. You seem to be twisting the law or lack the understanding how court works.