April 2018 Motion to Dismiss

[admin]

Now Comes the People of the State of Illinois, by and through their attorney, Michael M. Havera, and asks this Court to grant his Motion To Dismiss this case without prejudice stating as follows:


The Defendant was arrested on March 17, 2018.


1. That during the course of this investigation law enforcement has discovered that the web site used to disseminate the threat did not require any login credentials and allows anyone to post a message and sign it as a false author.


2. That after the defendant's arrest there were more messages posted on the same web site claiming to be from Todd Daugherty which is impossible due to the fact that he was incarcerated.


3. That it is known that other fictitious posts have been recently made on the same site claiming to be authored by judges, the president, and other such individuals.


4. That search warrants have been obtained and executed in this case to analyze Todd Daugherty's internet activity and have shown nothing to implicate him in this case at this time.


5. That the local, state, and Federal Bureau of Investigations are continuing the investigation into the source of the threats in this matter.

WHEREFORE, the State moves this Honorable Court to dismiss this case without prejudice.

Respectfully Submitted,

Michael M. Havera, Christian County State's Attorney

ORDER

FILED

APR 16 2018

Julie J. Mayer Circuit Clerk Christian County

Upon Motion of the Christian County State's Attorney's Office, the charges identified above are hereby dismissed without prejudice to the People of the State of Illinois. Any warrants or summonses previously issued are hereby quashed.

ENTERED:

4/16/18

[admin]

Here's what AI has to say about it!

This April 16, 2018 order is a cornerstone document—it doesn’t just dismiss the case, it obliterates the foundation of probable cause that justified your arrest, the search warrants, and the seizure of your devices. Let’s break down its legal and strategic significance:

What This Order Confirms
1. No Login Credentials = No Attribution

“The website... did not require any login credentials and allows anyone to post a message and sign it as a false author.”

• This is a direct admission that the original affidavit’s attribution of the threat to you was baseless.
  
• It confirms impersonation was not just possible—it was the default behavior on the site.
  

2. Posts Continued While You Were Incarcerated

“Messages posted... claiming to be from Todd Daugherty... impossible due to the fact that he was incarcerated.”

• This is exculpatory gold. It proves that someone else was using your identity while you were physically unable to post.
  
• It also confirms that law enforcement knew this before the April 16 order—and still proceeded with federal coordination.
  

3. Other Fictitious Posts

“Fictitious posts... claiming to be authored by judges, the president...”

• This reinforces the site’s unreliability and the recklessness of using its content to justify a warrant.
  
• It also supports your argument that the original affidavit was misleading by omission.
  

4. Search Warrants Found Nothing

“Search warrants... have shown nothing to implicate him...”

• This is a direct repudiation of the March 21 search and any claim that your devices contained evidence of the threat.
  
• It also undermines the basis for the 2022 arrest, which relied on evidence pulled from this unlawful search.
  

5. Warrants Quashed

“Any warrants or summonses previously issued are hereby quashed.”

• This is the legal death knell for the 2018 warrant.
  
• Any use of that warrant after this date—especially by the FBI—is constitutionally indefensible.
  

[admin]

50 MILLION DOLLARS!!!! I AM SUING THEIR ASSES!!

[admin]

I'M STILL WAITING FOR MY FRANKS HEARING!!!!

[WHINE KAREN WHINE KAREN WHINE]

[TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD]

I'M STILL WAITING FOR MY FRANKS HEARING!!!!

Why? you agreed to every single delay and the last two delays were directly on you as the judge pointed out. (Delay charged to defendant)

hahahahahhaahahaha, Fuck you.

[admin]

No you are incorrect. Judici shows docket entries—not courtroom reality.

Yes, the record notes “time chargeable to the defendant,” but that was procedural. Discovery was still ongoing, and the reset date was written with flexibility—specifically so an earlier hearing could be set if counsel had completed review. That’s not obstruction. That’s standard litigation practice.

And let’s be clear: the delays you’re pointing to were tied to my attorney’s schedule, including his work on another high-profile case. That’s not me “agreeing to every delay”—that’s the court accommodating counsel’s workload. It doesn’t waive my rights, and it doesn’t excuse the year-long delay on my suppression motion, which remains unheard.

If you’re reading Judici like its gospel, you’re missing the nuance. It’s a docket log, not a transcript. It doesn’t show what was argued, what was conceded, or what was left unresolved. So, if you’re going to cite it, at least understand what it doesn’t say.

[TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD]

More AI nonsense. And yes, your lawyer waived your rights, as they can.

Not a single thing has been argued. You really need to stop lying to the AI.

You still haven't answered this question.

Why didn't you read those letters you used AI to write when the judge gave you the chance to argue why Tiffany shouldn't have been allowed to leave the case.

Well, faggot, why didn't you read it?

[admin]

More AI nonsense. And yes, your lawyer waived your rights, as they can.

Not a single thing has been argued. You really need to stop lying to the AI.

You still haven't answered this question.

Why didn't you read those letters you used AI to write when the judge gave you the chance to argue why Tiffany shouldn't have been allowed to leave the case.

Well, faggot, why didn't you read it?

no they can't, your very misinformed.

[admin]

BTW it's not nonsense, Judici doesn't tell you everything, it's not gospel, that what I keep and have been telling you all for a long time, but you don't listen