comments I've been making

[admin]

The Protect act was deemed unconstitutional in UNITED STATES v. HANDLEY (2008) because it made 1. it put virtual child porn back into the category as real child porn which the court stated that it cannot be classified as child porn because child must be real images of real children engaged in sexual activity. The court also stated that for an image for obscene it must be all three prongs of the miller test. The Protect Act only required one of the three prongs, this making it unconstitutional. In 2025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN ANDEREGG, (2025) The district court in the 7th district ruled that the PROTECT ACT was unconstitutional because it made the possession of obscene material illegal which the US Supreme court in Stanley v Georgia ruled that it was legal to possession in the privacy in one. Since AI and virtual child porn wasn't real child porn and is can only been deemed obscene, and possession of it in the privacy in your own home is not illegal.