HERE'S A COMMENT FROM A JACKASS -WANTABE LAWYER ...
![[Image: n1.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/n1.jpg)
REALLY?? This warrant was a general warrant because 1. they didn't have probable cause, because they didn't corroborate the anonymous tipster tip and did no investigation to show any linkage between the threat and my computers. in fact, the information they did get proved that I didn't do it. It was also a general warrant because it didn't particularize what was to be seized. The police not only searched 15 devices, but they also seized everything on those devices. The US Supreme court has stated that is unconstitutional and a general warrant because they don't have probable cause for everything on the devices. The police cannot seize everything in a computer or cell phone, they must specify what file or file type they are wanting to seize. My warrant not only didn't specify what file was to be seized, it state on it what the crime was, nor did it incorporate the affidavit.
THUS, THE WARRANT WAS A GENERAL WARRANT!!!
REALLY?? This warrant was a general warrant because 1. they didn't have probable cause, because they didn't corroborate the anonymous tipster tip and did no investigation to show any linkage between the threat and my computers. in fact, the information they did get proved that I didn't do it. It was also a general warrant because it didn't particularize what was to be seized. The police not only searched 15 devices, but they also seized everything on those devices. The US Supreme court has stated that is unconstitutional and a general warrant because they don't have probable cause for everything on the devices. The police cannot seize everything in a computer or cell phone, they must specify what file or file type they are wanting to seize. My warrant not only didn't specify what file was to be seized, it state on it what the crime was, nor did it incorporate the affidavit.
THUS, THE WARRANT WAS A GENERAL WARRANT!!!