Why The 2015 Arrest Was Unlawful

[admin]

My Response:
Let me address your points directly.

1. Legal Basis for Retention: Once charges are dismissed, the State no longer has the legal authority to retain my property unless a valid forfeiture action or new warrant is filed. Multiple constitutional precedents—including the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments—confirm that continued possession of personal property without legal justification amounts to unlawful seizure.
   
   
2. Filing Forms: The idea that property cannot be returned without filling out paperwork ignores that unlawful retention isn’t cured by bureaucracy. I don’t surrender constitutional rights simply because I didn’t fill out the right form. The burden is on the State to justify retention—not on me to beg for what is mine.
   
3. Quashed Warrants and Dismissed Charges: The distinction is irrelevant if there's no active warrant or lawful hold. The government cannot continue to possess private devices indefinitely under the excuse of a speculative future reinstatement.
   
4. Personal Attacks: Mocking whether I filed lawsuits or how my hearing was conducted says more about your priorities than mine. Legal strategy isn’t measured by internet posts—it’s measured by constitutional validity. And attacking family members to undermine legal arguments is a tactic that courts see through immediately.
   

If you’re serious about understanding the law, focus on the Constitution—not Kiwifarms. And if your goal is to intimidate or gaslight, I’m not the audience for that.

Let’s keep the conversation on track: Is there a legal basis for retaining my devices once charges are dismissed? Because unless you can show one, all the distractions are just noise trying to drown out accountability.