Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Todd Daugherty – Case Summary Constitutional Violations and Procedural Misconduct
#6
My ability to seek legal representation is entirely mine to manage. Suggesting that my father needs to "get busy" or that I'm incapable of doing so on my own is not only patronizing—it’s irrelevant to the legal realities of my case.

As for mental competency: that determination requires evidence, not conjecture. Judges follow a strict standard before ordering psychological evaluation. They don't base those decisions on internet opinions or assumptions. Unless you're a licensed attorney or mental health expert involved in the proceedings, you're in no position to predict what a judge might do—and frankly, it's irresponsible to weaponize mental health as leverage.

The idea that the DA would "gladly suspend the case" ignores due process. If charges are dismissed, the State must follow the law—not personal vendettas or procedural loopholes.

If you want to debate legal procedure, stick to facts—not fear tactics. If you're here to support justice, then elevate the conversation. But if you're just trying to sow doubt or demean someone's ability to defend themselves, that says a lot more about your motives than about my circumstances.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Todd Daugherty – Case Summary Constitutional Violations and Procedural Misconduct - by admin - 07-10-2025, 11:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)