O'Sullivan found what he noted what appeared to be a computer-generated image of a minor child with an adult male penis in his mouth.
In Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) the United States Supreme Court ruled that computer-generated images were not only legal but constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment. I belong with a few groups that filed Amicus Briefs supporting the Free Speech Coalition. In 2003 the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in People of the State of Illinois v Kenneth Alexander that computer-generated images were legal and constitutional protected speech under the First Amendment. The Illinois Supreme Court also severed a part of the Illinois Child Pornography law because it was unconstitutional. Although that section was severed from the rest of the law, it is still in the law and is still being used by police and the Attorney's for the State of Illinois to this day. In fact, it is the same law and portions of the law that the State Attorney is using on me.
Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition | 535 U.S. 234 (2002) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
People of the State of Illinois v Kenneth Alexander
People v. Alexander :: 2003 :: Supreme Court of Illinois Decisions :: Illinois Case Law :: Illinois Law :: US Law :: Justia
So NOW not only am I going to sue the City, State, and FBI for that General Warrant Crap, I going to sue them as well for Free Speech
In Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) the United States Supreme Court ruled that computer-generated images were not only legal but constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment. I belong with a few groups that filed Amicus Briefs supporting the Free Speech Coalition. In 2003 the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in People of the State of Illinois v Kenneth Alexander that computer-generated images were legal and constitutional protected speech under the First Amendment. The Illinois Supreme Court also severed a part of the Illinois Child Pornography law because it was unconstitutional. Although that section was severed from the rest of the law, it is still in the law and is still being used by police and the Attorney's for the State of Illinois to this day. In fact, it is the same law and portions of the law that the State Attorney is using on me.
Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition | 535 U.S. 234 (2002) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
People of the State of Illinois v Kenneth Alexander
People v. Alexander :: 2003 :: Supreme Court of Illinois Decisions :: Illinois Case Law :: Illinois Law :: US Law :: Justia
So NOW not only am I going to sue the City, State, and FBI for that General Warrant Crap, I going to sue them as well for Free Speech