07-15-2025, 03:37 PM
Let’s talk about timing—because it exposes the truth.
- The alleged threat was posted on March 16, 2018.
- The search warrant for my 15 computers was issued on March 21, 2018—five days later.
If the police truly believed this was an “imminent threat,” they wouldn’t have waited nearly a week to act. That delay proves they had time to:
- Investigate the source of the post
- Corroborate the anonymous tip
- Verify whether I had access to the site or the internet
- Determine whether the threat was credible or fabricated
Instead, they rushed to arrest me without investigation, then waited five days to seize my property—based on a general warrant and an affidavit that omitted key facts.
This wasn’t a response to an imminent threat. It was a failure to investigate, followed by a constitutionally defective search.
- The alleged threat was posted on March 16, 2018.
- The search warrant for my 15 computers was issued on March 21, 2018—five days later.
If the police truly believed this was an “imminent threat,” they wouldn’t have waited nearly a week to act. That delay proves they had time to:
- Investigate the source of the post
- Corroborate the anonymous tip
- Verify whether I had access to the site or the internet
- Determine whether the threat was credible or fabricated
Instead, they rushed to arrest me without investigation, then waited five days to seize my property—based on a general warrant and an affidavit that omitted key facts.
This wasn’t a response to an imminent threat. It was a failure to investigate, followed by a constitutionally defective search.