07-22-2025, 01:56 PM
- Stanford v. Texas (1965): The Supreme Court struck down a warrant that allowed seizure of all books and papers, calling it a “general warrant” and a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
- Marron v. United States (1927): The Court ruled that a warrant must describe with particularity the items to be seized. General warrants are unconstitutional.
- Groh v. Ramirez (2004): A warrant that failed to list the items to be seized was held invalid, and the executing officer was not protected by qualified immunity.
- Marron v. United States (1927): The Court ruled that a warrant must describe with particularity the items to be seized. General warrants are unconstitutional.
- Groh v. Ramirez (2004): A warrant that failed to list the items to be seized was held invalid, and the executing officer was not protected by qualified immunity.