yeah, let's see your bullshit comment ...
There was NO CONSENT the searched the computers in the hearing or otherwise. the search was based on a search warrant ... a search warrant that was QUASHED! either: 1. they didn't give a shit that the warrant was quashed or 2. no one told them that the warrant had been quashed. BTW that why they keep telling us that they first had 30 days then they claimed they had 3 years, because they were under impression that the warrant was valid. EVEN if the warrant was valid (which it wasn't) there is still the issue of it being a GENERAL WARRANT. It's a general warrant because they did not state what they were seizing or the crime.
Quote:"Doesn't matter, you consented to the search and investigation in that hearing. But it wasn't a general warrant, it was very specific in what they were looking for. And the hearing said the search could continue... Remember, it was you who said they had three years to keep investigating your computers."
There was NO CONSENT the searched the computers in the hearing or otherwise. the search was based on a search warrant ... a search warrant that was QUASHED! either: 1. they didn't give a shit that the warrant was quashed or 2. no one told them that the warrant had been quashed. BTW that why they keep telling us that they first had 30 days then they claimed they had 3 years, because they were under impression that the warrant was valid. EVEN if the warrant was valid (which it wasn't) there is still the issue of it being a GENERAL WARRANT. It's a general warrant because they did not state what they were seizing or the crime.