12-05-2024, 12:39 AM
(12-05-2024, 12:16 AM)Guest Wrote: And all kinds of school activities happen on Friday afternoon and nights...
Immanent threat and probable cause. But doesn't matter because you consented to the computer searches when you got released in April 2018.
Those teens on that youtube video are heroes. Because of them, we know for certain you are a pedophile who downloads child pornography.
Maybe if you didn't lie to the police and continue to make threats on Twitter, who knows..... Oh well, you know it all.
Nope, NOR does it give the police an excuse not to investigate, which they didn't - THEY DID NO INVESTIGATION because in their minds that was a threat that was my name and therefore a reasonable person would believe I did it. I didn't do it, and they had evidence to prove I didn't do it. Again, No I didn't not give them consent show me exactly where it states that I gave them consent to search my computers.
I made no threat toward twitter. vague comments and comments that are hyperbole are not consider threats (US SUPREME COURT 1969) The US Supreme Court has also stated that the government must use a selective standard with a mens rea (Elonis v United States 2015 and Counterman v Colorado 2022) Police are not allowed to use a reasonable person standard.
A mens rea ~ In criminal law, mens rea (/ˈmɛnz ˈreɪə/; Law Latin for "guilty mind") is the mental state of a defendant who is accused of committing a crime. In common law jurisdictions, most crimes require proof both of mens rea and actus reus ("guilty act") before the defendant can be found guilty.
The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty". As a general rule, someone who acted without mental fault is not liable in criminal law. Exceptions are known as strict liability crimes. Moreover, when a person intends a harm, but as a result of bad aim or other cause the intent is transferred from an intended victim to an unintended victim, the case is considered to be a matter of transferred intent.