How am I going to jail??

[admin]

They did do an investigation as the court records you posted show. They don't have any evidence that you didn't do it, all they said is they didn't have anything to implicate you "at this time". That is not the same as "you didn't do it". You gave consent to the investigation and search to continue in your April 2018 hearing. The judge even asked if you understood. You said yes.

Obviously the twitter threats were proof of mens rea along with you very well documented past history of making threats and your confessions to making them both in writing on your own and in your plea bargain agreement.

Now, did you do it? I think you probably did or those teens on youtube did it. And because you didn't follow my advice to hire a real lawyer, I guess we'll never know if those teens did it or not. Oh well.......

But the bottom line is you are a child pornographer, you had child pornography on your computer, and everyone knows it. 

it never goes away, never, ever!!!!

No, they didn't and what court records are you claiming. They had more evidence that what was originally stated some materials I didn't see until this motion to suppress, they were trying to save face for the FUCK UP they did, and they did FUCK UP! 

NO WHERE did I state that I consented to a search, and with evidence they did have (more than what was originally known) they couldn't prove it was me beyond a reasonable doubt, hell they didn't even have probable cause. The police fucked up; it was one fuck up after another causing a bigger fuck up. I never confessed to making threats, I did admit to harassment (a class B misdemeanor) which is nothing more than a petty crime. 
twitter was never brought up, and no that was mens rea. I suggest you read a few court cases including Elonis v United States and Counterman v Colorado. 

Elonis v. United States is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a conviction for threatening another person on social media requires proof of subjective intent to threaten

Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable as crimes and free speech protected by the First Amendment. The states and lower courts were divided over how to define the line. By a 7-2 majority, the court decided that statements are not free speech if the defendant recklessly disregarded a substantial risk that their statements would be viewed as threatening violence.

I don't who those guys on Youtube were, nor is it my job to know or my lawyers, it the police's job. IF YOU WANT TO BE A COP DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!! PART OF YOUR JOB IS TO INVESTIGATE, NOT HALF-ASS IT. The police in this town don't want to do their fucking job instead they got fucking judges rubber stamping them warrants like fucking Christmas every day. HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE DO YOU THINK ARE IN JAIL BECAUSE THE POLICE DID DO THEIR FUCKING JOB!?!? 

They got an anonymous tip from the FBI, their job is to corroborate the tip before even making a fuck arrest...THAT HAS BEEN THE FUCKING STANDARD SINCE THE 1980'S US SUPREME COURT CASE OF ILLINOIS V GATES!! THE US SUPREME COURT HAS FUCKING STATED THAT THEY FUCKING HAVE TO DO IT!!

The police received an anonymous tip that the Gates were going to Florida to pick up car filled with drugs and drive them back to Illinois. The police did go and arrest the fucking Gates the police investigated prior the arrest. they corroborated the tip before making the arrest. There are other cases (recent cases) which the courts have state the police must corroborate an anonymous tip. 


NOPE didn't have child porn on my computer, had computer - generated images also known as virtual child porn which is LEGAL!!!!! AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTED SPEECH