12-05-2024, 06:27 PM
here let me break it down for you.
They received a threat against a school, the next day they came to my house, and I told them I didn't do it, they then arrested me. two days after that they got my IP address from my internet service provider and two days after that using my IP got a warrant to search and seize my computers. Seven days after that they got the information from the ISP and lawyer of the hate and flame which showed I wasn't even on the site. this is not the way they should have done it.
The proper procedure under Illinois v Gates would have been they got the threat, and come to my house and talk and if I told them I didn't do they then could either say ok or hold me for a few days while they got my IP address and at the same time the information from the ISP from the hate and flame and confirm there is a LINK between the threat and my computer. If there is no LINK than they have to let me go.
There has to be a LINK between my computer and the threat, I told them I didn't post the threat and twelve days later due to their lack of understanding how the fucking internet works it was confirmed by the ISP and Lawyer for the ISP of the Hate and Flame website, that I had not been on that site and there was NO LINK between the threat and my computer. If they would have got the information from the start, I wouldn't have spent a month in jail and NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING. So NOW they are going to get sued.
They received a threat against a school, the next day they came to my house, and I told them I didn't do it, they then arrested me. two days after that they got my IP address from my internet service provider and two days after that using my IP got a warrant to search and seize my computers. Seven days after that they got the information from the ISP and lawyer of the hate and flame which showed I wasn't even on the site. this is not the way they should have done it.
The proper procedure under Illinois v Gates would have been they got the threat, and come to my house and talk and if I told them I didn't do they then could either say ok or hold me for a few days while they got my IP address and at the same time the information from the ISP from the hate and flame and confirm there is a LINK between the threat and my computer. If there is no LINK than they have to let me go.
There has to be a LINK between my computer and the threat, I told them I didn't post the threat and twelve days later due to their lack of understanding how the fucking internet works it was confirmed by the ISP and Lawyer for the ISP of the Hate and Flame website, that I had not been on that site and there was NO LINK between the threat and my computer. If they would have got the information from the start, I wouldn't have spent a month in jail and NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING. So NOW they are going to get sued.