Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3.25 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Warrant
#8
(08-25-2025, 12:10 AM)admin Wrote:
Quote:It was Nolle Presqui and the judge made it clear to you that the investigation could continue and you could be charged again. You told the judge that you understood this and agreed to it in full. Plus the fact they investigated and did Nolle Presqui the charge relieves them means they did their job properly and investigated.


No, it wasn't:

04/16/2018 Motion to Dismiss filed by the State. Order entered and filed. Case dismissed.

And of course, the part the schizo doesn't mention

04/16/2018 
SA, DEF IN CUSTODY W/PD GRIGSBY. STATES MOTION TO DISMISS W/LEAVE TO REINSTATE GRANTED W/OUT OBJECTION. DEFENDANT ADVISED STATE RETAINS RIGHT TO RE-FILE AS INVESTIGATION CONTINUES. NFS.


1. It is on the defendant to ask for a copy. I can't help it if you or your parents didn't.

2. Again, court records says Probable cause for both the 2018 and 2022... That is not disputable.

3. You lied to the cops, changed your story, changed your timeline, and lied about not knowing anything about school threats when your own Twitter posting said otherwise. You also threatened to show up at Twitter headquarters and the FBI wouldn't save them. That''s a threat but Twitter decided not to press charges. But doesn't matter, judge at the time declared it probable cause.

4. And no, future evidence can not retroactively change the "probable cause" for the date it was issued, it's simply a new ruling that probable cause is no longer in effect but no error in the part of the prosecution as the judge declared it to be probable. As the court records say, the investigation could continue and you even admitted as such endlessly on KiwiFarms and your own forums. It's proof that you have changed your story.

5. And on top of that, the judge signed the search warrant, and it's the judges job to review to warrant to make sure it's valid... Since the judge signed it, if there is a constitutional issue, that's on the judge. But no matter, the Statute of Limitations as long expired for you to take any action.

6. AAgain, nd the statute of limitations has long expired, for example, the City of Taylorville even if you are completely correct has no burden to meet because the action happened in 2018. The State can't extend their liability as they are not the same entity and a different party. Same with the FBI, they have no action since 2020. But no worries, you are just ranting on the internet and you will never file any lawsuit.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Warrant - by admin - 08-24-2025, 05:49 PM
RE: The Warrant - by mercury - 08-24-2025, 06:15 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-24-2025, 08:23 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-24-2025, 08:49 PM
RE: The Warrant - by mercury - 08-24-2025, 10:01 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 12:10 AM
RE: The Warrant - by mercury - 08-25-2025, 02:53 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 12:37 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 04:46 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 05:15 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 11:13 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 02:19 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 09:46 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-25-2025, 11:58 PM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-26-2025, 11:09 AM
RE: The Warrant - by admin - 08-26-2025, 02:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)