Quote:You consented, which is why the DA says the warrant is valid
No I didn't. there is No document that says that I consent for them to continue. The US Supreme Court has also state that to search digital device 'THEY MUST HAVE A SEARCH WARRANT' the reason is, because digital device can contain a lot of personal and private information, which they do not have probable cause to search.
Quote:No statute of limitations on child porn possession
No there is a time limit on when to get a second warrant. that time limit is 30 days, after 30 days it is considered unreasonable and therefore unconstitutional.
Quote:Only after the warrant was issued and the evidence examined. And the judge on March 19 ruled probable cause, plus it was an imminent threat to life and safety of children. You also admitted to seeing the post.
And your lawyer isn't going to ask for Franks Hearing because you can not afford, and him and only him decides on that. You have no say in any legal proceedings other than GUILTY/INNOCENT.
The search warrant wasn't issued on March 19, but it was March 21. There was no ‘imminent threat,’ It was made on a Friday afternoon. Schools were closed for the weekend. There was no scheduled event, no named target, no actionable urgency. So, the claim of an ‘imminent threat to children’ doesn’t hold up under scrutiny—it was a vague, anonymous post on a public site that allowed impersonation.
If they genuinely believed lives were at risk, they wouldn’t have waited days to act. And they wouldn’t have relied on a post that continued under my name while I was incarcerated. That’s not probable cause. That’s misidentification.
Franks v. Delaware doesn’t say ‘only if your lawyer feels like it.’ It says if I make a substantial showing that the warrant was based on falsehoods or omissions, the court must grant a hearing. I’ve made that showing. The warrant was quashed. The post was proven anonymous. The forensic search found nothing. And as for your claim that I have no say—read the Constitution. I have every right to challenge the process that tried to erase me. And I’m doing it.
Quote:Here is another case I read on.
Springfield Man was investigated BY FBI for CSAM
AUSA declined prosecution and handed the case over to the state
State case Nolle Presqui. This was 2018
FIVE YEARS LATER...
AUSA picks back up case, goes to federal grand jury
Feds charge him with dozens of CSAM and other nasty things.
Man pleas guilty, sentence to pretty much the rest of his life.
And the real funny thing, guess who his lawyer was?? Mark Wykoff!!!
Mark Wykoff appealed the judges decision, and told Wykoff to eat shit. Decision stands.
My case was dismissed. The warrant was quashed. The post was proven false. And the alleged CSAM was found years later, under a general warrant that had already been invalidated. That’s not justice—it’s retroactive justification for an unconstitutional search.