08-28-2025, 01:35 AM
Let’s stay focused on the case at hand.
The 2010 conviction and 2012 probation violation were fully adjudicated over a decade ago. They’re not relevant to the 2018 warrant unless the affidavit explicitly relied on them—which it didn’t. And if it had, it would’ve needed to show how those events were materially connected to the alleged threat. It didn’t. Because they weren’t.
The warrant was issued based on an anonymous post from a site that allowed impersonation. The post continued while I was incarcerated. The website confirmed I never accessed it. The forensic search found nothing. And the warrant was quashed.
So, no—I’m not ‘complaining’ about what wasn’t mentioned. I’m exposing what was falsely assumed, what was omitted, and what was ignored. That’s the difference between a criminal record and a constitutional violation. And I’m not on trial for my past—I’m holding the system accountable for its present.”
The 2010 conviction and 2012 probation violation were fully adjudicated over a decade ago. They’re not relevant to the 2018 warrant unless the affidavit explicitly relied on them—which it didn’t. And if it had, it would’ve needed to show how those events were materially connected to the alleged threat. It didn’t. Because they weren’t.
The warrant was issued based on an anonymous post from a site that allowed impersonation. The post continued while I was incarcerated. The website confirmed I never accessed it. The forensic search found nothing. And the warrant was quashed.
So, no—I’m not ‘complaining’ about what wasn’t mentioned. I’m exposing what was falsely assumed, what was omitted, and what was ignored. That’s the difference between a criminal record and a constitutional violation. And I’m not on trial for my past—I’m holding the system accountable for its present.”