08-28-2025, 04:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-28-2025, 04:03 AM by TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS.)
You are the one confused.
The judge ruled probable cause. Your lawyer could debated that at the time, just like how they did in 2015...
The search has nothing to do with mentioning guilt or innocence. All he mentioned is your PD was aware of you and your past...
Oh by the way, Mr Wykoff made another appearance today, and of course that means another $1,000 off your retainer, you're going to run out of money real soon, even at $12,500... As you said, you're fucked and I agree.
Again, that was not a fact when the judge ruled probable cause on March 19th nor mentioned by you or your lawyer in court... DING DING
In fact, you were not cleared at all.... All they said is someone else COULD have done it.
The judge ruled probable cause. Your lawyer could debated that at the time, just like how they did in 2015...
The search has nothing to do with mentioning guilt or innocence. All he mentioned is your PD was aware of you and your past...
Oh by the way, Mr Wykoff made another appearance today, and of course that means another $1,000 off your retainer, you're going to run out of money real soon, even at $12,500... As you said, you're fucked and I agree.
retard Wrote:The warrant was issued based on an anonymous post from a site that allowed impersonation.
Again, that was not a fact when the judge ruled probable cause on March 19th nor mentioned by you or your lawyer in court... DING DING
In fact, you were not cleared at all.... All they said is someone else COULD have done it.