A Reply

[admin]

The issue is JACKASS, is the FBI agent LIED about the image. The FBI agent that found the image said it was computer generated while another agent who took the case when to the federal judge claiming it was child porn. when the AUSA declined to take the case that slimeball FBI agent went to the Illinois state police claiming it was child porn. So, Illinois was under the impression that it was child porn.

I AM GOING TO SUE THE FUCK OUT OF THEM!!!

Let me explain it to you. Child porn under US and Illinois law must be images of REAL children engaged in sexual activity. The reason they had to be real children and not computer generated (ie created by a computer program like Daz3d or Autodesk Maya) is because there has to be a victim. As the US Supreme Court has stated computer generated images or virtual child porn has no real victim. Child porn has been illegal since the earlier 80's prior to that it was legal. The reason it became illegal was the harm it did to real children. Child porn in itself is constitutional protected speech, what stops it is how it is made. In fact, in Ferber v New York (US Supreme Court 1982) The US Supreme Court stated that some child porn has some first amendment protection, however, it is how it made that makes it illegal (the harming of real children) That's why in 2002 in Ashcroft v Free Speech coalition the US Supreme court ruled that virtual child porn was legal because it didn't use or harm real children (unlike Ferber which used real children) The child porn laws isn't there to stop what it's displaying, it there to stop how it is being made with using REAL children. virtual child porn covers that market because it doesn't use real children.