09-06-2025, 03:24 PM
Why is the state and this court allowing this game to go on as long as it has?? (4 years) (8 years if you want to count the original charge back in 2018) The warrant was a general warrant, that was quashed, and the FBI searched the computers without a warrant. There was no consent (Like some believe) in fact the FBI even told the Federal judge when they got the second warrant that they had those computers under a valid state warrant that allowed the seizure of all digital devices. So even the FBI knew there was no consent, that it was based on a search warrant which they believed was vali, when in fact it was quashed, WHICH BRINGS ME TO THE NEXT QUESTION...
The FBI was made aware that the charges were dropped by the police, why didn't the FBI call the state or the courthouse and ask if the warrant was still valid (FYI they didn't call or there is no record of them calling)? Why didn't check the warrant to see if it complied with the fourth amendment? Is that why the AUSA didn't want to take the case, because he knew the warrant was a general warrant?
The FBI was made aware that the charges were dropped by the police, why didn't the FBI call the state or the courthouse and ask if the warrant was still valid (FYI they didn't call or there is no record of them calling)? Why didn't check the warrant to see if it complied with the fourth amendment? Is that why the AUSA didn't want to take the case, because he knew the warrant was a general warrant?