09-06-2025, 10:06 PM
(11-29-2024, 06:26 PM)Guest Wrote: Because none of those 5 things you mentioned are not true plus you consented to the search continuing in April 2018. That's why the warrant was quashed as they needed to no longer seize any more computer devices. Did you notice the judge never ordered the items to be returned to you, and you didn't ask until at least 2021.
Oh, you'll see.... You said the same thing in 2015 and 2018..... 2026 is coming.
There was no consent, even the FBI admit to a federal judge that they had those computers under a state warrant. meaning they had those computers not under consent but under a warrant that again was a general warrant, and it was later quashed. The argument that the judge allowed the government to continue their investigation doesn't mean they have consent for two reasons 1. a judge can't order consent; it has to be given by the owner. that consent must be a sign document stating the owner of the devices are allowing the search of the devices. 2. they didn't have probable cause. To get consent or even a warrant you have to have probable cause. The state admitted in their 2018 motion to dismiss that they no longer had probable cause. So, yeah this who thing now shouldn't really be happening, what they did was illegal and them (the state) continuing to fight it shows that the state has no remorse for violating someone's constitutional rights.