02-13-2026, 10:46 PM
There were people on this board and on KiwiFarms that claimed I was lying and I was going to prison ... the truth is I WASN'T!!!
From Judici:
02/10/2026: SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED. COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.
A simple version for those that can't read:
On February 10, 2026, the State’s Attorney, the defendant, and defense attorney Wykoff appeared in court for a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Both sides presented their arguments.
The court summarized the facts as follows:
On March 21, 2018, a warrant was issued to seize all computer equipment from the defendant’s home.
Those items were turned over to the FBI on April 4, 2018.
On April 16, 2018, the State dismissed the original charges and officially quashed all warrants (as shown in Exhibit I).
Later that same day, April 16, the FBI performed an inventory of the seized items.
Three days after that, the FBI searched the electronic devices.
Seven days after the warrant had been quashed, the FBI found the evidence at issue.
A federal warrant was not sought until two years later.
The court found that once the case was dismissed and the warrant was quashed on April 16, 2018, the FBI no longer had any legal authority to keep the defendant’s property, let alone search it. Searching the devices after the warrant was quashed was a clear violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.
The motion to suppress was granted, and the case was dismissed.
The court ordered that any remaining balance owed be refunded, minus clerk’s fees.
From Judici:
02/10/2026: SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED. COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.
A simple version for those that can't read:
On February 10, 2026, the State’s Attorney, the defendant, and defense attorney Wykoff appeared in court for a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Both sides presented their arguments.
The court summarized the facts as follows:
On March 21, 2018, a warrant was issued to seize all computer equipment from the defendant’s home.
Those items were turned over to the FBI on April 4, 2018.
On April 16, 2018, the State dismissed the original charges and officially quashed all warrants (as shown in Exhibit I).
Later that same day, April 16, the FBI performed an inventory of the seized items.
Three days after that, the FBI searched the electronic devices.
Seven days after the warrant had been quashed, the FBI found the evidence at issue.
A federal warrant was not sought until two years later.
The court found that once the case was dismissed and the warrant was quashed on April 16, 2018, the FBI no longer had any legal authority to keep the defendant’s property, let alone search it. Searching the devices after the warrant was quashed was a clear violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.
The motion to suppress was granted, and the case was dismissed.
The court ordered that any remaining balance owed be refunded, minus clerk’s fees.