01-20-2025, 05:44 AM
(01-20-2025, 04:21 AM)Todd Daugherty Library Wrote: Safe-T act doesn't cover sex offenses... I suggest you look up sex offenders who have been arrested in your county since the law passed. Every single case the judge denied it and Tiffany accepted it. Sound familiar by the way???
Defendant present in person and in custody with Public Defender
Senger who is appointed to represent the Defendant. State's Attorney Present. Case called for preliminary hearing and hearing on the State's petition to deny pretrial release. Detective Nelson of the Taylorville Police Department sworn and testifies. Arguments heard. Petition to deny pretrial release granted for reasons stated on the record.
Like I said, you can not afford...
Actually Safe-T act does in fact a person here in Chirstian County (who was being charged on Child sex abuse I believe, challenged it and won. They had his bail high and he appealed the deinal of a hearing under the safe T act and won. The ONLY thing I know that it wouldn't apply to is probably murderers. There also Supreme Court rulings regarding social media which they stated that Anything on the internet is considered social media. (Packham v North Carolina 2017) there also the eighth amendment of the US Constitution regarding excessive BAIL. Excessive bail is considered unconstitutional. Bail is not meant to punish someone accused of a crime, it is a means to make sure the person appears before the court, which for the last three years, going on four I have done so. Now judges can make conditions in the bail agreement that is meant to keep the public safe. But when it comes to communication (speech) they have to take to first amendment into consideration. For example, a judge can bar someone accused of staking or harassment a victim from not communicating with the victim while the trial is going on. But a judge has to weight in the accuses first amendment right and can completely bar his speech. If this judge or state attorney have a problem with it, they need to take it up with US Supreme Court, because THEY ARE THE ONES THAT ARE REQUIRING THE JUDGES TO THAT.
so go fuck yourself