01-25-2025, 04:27 AM
(01-25-2025, 02:39 AM)NO TOAD Wrote: NO TOAD
Oh, and the motion is Dismissal is going to be withdrawn by her upon the DA's response.... It will all be decided at breakfast without your input before the hearing.
1. THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. SHE ALONE HAS THE AUTHORITY.
2. If she doesn't the judge denies it, you can no longer use any of those arguments in your defense at trial. She isn't going to risk that because you will have nothing left to defend. The prosecution will state witnesses that it was child porn and she won't be able to refute. That's why she is going to withdraw the motion.
3. The lengthy motion was an attempt to get the DA to drop due to laziness. He has taken a personal interest in your case so that's not happening.
So it looks like this is going to trial. And you're fucked.. And you're going to prison...
My suggestion, your parents pay $20,000 into his re-election campaign to get him to drop the charges.
Or a plea deal... I think you're shit yourself in the end and accept it.
And one more thing PEDO
If by some chance the DA thinks he's going to lose, he'll file a Nolle Presqui
Which means you can't sue..... You need at a minimum and DISMISSAL with PREJUDICE
But you have no say in the matter, if the DA Nolle Presqui, you aren't allowed to challenge it.
Remember that...
1. THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. SHE ALONE HAS THE AUTHORITY.
No she has to run it by me after all she is working for me.
2. If she doesn't the judge denies it, you can no longer use any of those arguments in your defense at trial. She isn't going to risk that because you will have nothing left to defend. The prosecution will state witnesses that it was child porn and she won't be able to refute. That's why she is going to withdraw the motion.
They have to argue some because one of the issues is the image itself. which says it a computer-generated image. There also the issue of if I knew the image was there or not and knew if it was real. So those argument will have to sorted out, plus we do have our expert witnesses.
3. The lengthy motion was an attempt to get the DA to drop due to laziness. He has taken a personal interest in your case so that's not happening.
The length is nothing compared to some of the motions I have read, as for laziness, the only laziness was the police who didn't do their job right to begin with. As for his person interest, he can suck my dick, anyone who tries to weasel their way of a general warrant don't deserve to have power, or a license to practice law. general warrant illegal and the one in question is one, any lawyer who tries to fight claiming it was NOT a general warrant don't deserve to have a license to practice law. There is NOTHING THAT SHOWS THAT THE WARRANT ISN'T A GENERAL WARRANT. The warrant seized everything, the federal courts and US Supreme Court has stated that police or the government can't seize EVERYTHING...WHY??? BECAUSE IT A FUCKING GENERAL WARRANT WHEN YOU DO!