01-28-2025, 04:51 PM
Simply put:
The police without probable cause because they did no investigation to verify if I was the one who made the treat or not. Instead, they based their claim on an uncorroborated tip, without verifying if the tip was valid or not. All they had do is get my IP address and the logs from the website to prove it. But instead of doing that they arrest me, put me in jail for on a $250,000 dollar bond. Then go to a judge, who had just become a judge got a general warrant to seize all my computers, and not stating what the crime was or what they were looking for, nor did they explain how they had probable cause. Then on March 29th they did get the files from the ISP of the Hate and Flame, and it showed that I was not on that site. The Lawyer of NSFN also stated to the police that there was no login requirement, no email verified, impersonation is the status quo; everything I told the police the night I got arrest. Instead of going to the judge and updating them in regard to the search warrant (which they are required to do) on April 6th they ask the FBI to search the computers (although they knew they no longer had probable cause) On April 11th the FBI seized the computers from the police department and on April 16th the charges were dropped, based on lack of probable cause. The FBI was then allowed to rummage through those computers because the search warrant didn't state what they were supposed to look for. Without the particularities they were allowed to rummage and search everywhere in the computers and seize any file they deemed was "contraband". When they found a computer-generated image, they stopped to get a second warrant to search for "child porn" and they wait over a YEAR to get the second warrant. The court has repeatedly stated that waiting over 31 days is unreasonable, and therefore unconstitutional. When the AUSA declined to take the case (probably because he knew there were issues with it) the FBI sent to back to the state on the grounds that everything was on the up and up.
The police without probable cause because they did no investigation to verify if I was the one who made the treat or not. Instead, they based their claim on an uncorroborated tip, without verifying if the tip was valid or not. All they had do is get my IP address and the logs from the website to prove it. But instead of doing that they arrest me, put me in jail for on a $250,000 dollar bond. Then go to a judge, who had just become a judge got a general warrant to seize all my computers, and not stating what the crime was or what they were looking for, nor did they explain how they had probable cause. Then on March 29th they did get the files from the ISP of the Hate and Flame, and it showed that I was not on that site. The Lawyer of NSFN also stated to the police that there was no login requirement, no email verified, impersonation is the status quo; everything I told the police the night I got arrest. Instead of going to the judge and updating them in regard to the search warrant (which they are required to do) on April 6th they ask the FBI to search the computers (although they knew they no longer had probable cause) On April 11th the FBI seized the computers from the police department and on April 16th the charges were dropped, based on lack of probable cause. The FBI was then allowed to rummage through those computers because the search warrant didn't state what they were supposed to look for. Without the particularities they were allowed to rummage and search everywhere in the computers and seize any file they deemed was "contraband". When they found a computer-generated image, they stopped to get a second warrant to search for "child porn" and they wait over a YEAR to get the second warrant. The court has repeatedly stated that waiting over 31 days is unreasonable, and therefore unconstitutional. When the AUSA declined to take the case (probably because he knew there were issues with it) the FBI sent to back to the state on the grounds that everything was on the up and up.