02-08-2025, 09:28 PM
(02-08-2025, 06:36 PM)Todd Daugherty Library Wrote: The statute of limitations for you to sue has expired. You also confuse criminal statute of limitations with civil... There is no statute of limitations for sex crimes so the state has all the time in the world....
There will be another delay on Tuesday, filed by your lawyer.. You have no say in the matter.. She owns you and knows how to make you calm down.
THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
Oh, I noticed you didn't respond to where I brought up your legal guardians........
They own you completely. They can cut off your internet, take away the computers, throw your shitty stories and sex dolls in the trash, and even throw you out of the house completely if you don't obey them.
THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
Child Fucker Daugherty Wrote:Even with the warrant they are restricted to the particularities. NO where does the warrant mention ANYTHING about images nor does the affidavit mention anything about searching for images. So, either: 1. they went out the scope of the warrant. 2. the particularity was so broad that it allowed them to search and seize anything, thus making it a general warrant.
No, they didn't seize everything, your child sex dolls weren't seized for example. And the warrant was specific that the search involve looking into threats (which the FBI agent testified to) and images certainly can be threats or evidence like photos of the schools you wanted to shoot up.
While looking for evidence involving the school shooting, they found in the open images of your sick child pornography collection. It's all in your paperwork you posted. Plus you consented to the search and were too stupid not to hire a real lawyer or contest the warrant until it was too late.
So answer this, will you agree to another delay on Tuesday?? it's a YES or NO answer, anything else means Tiffany controls the entire process and not you...
NO YOU DUMBFUCK, THEY SEIZED EVERYTHING ON THE COMPUTER....THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SEZIED EVERYTHING ON THE COMPUTER. No where in the warrant do they say they are looking for a threat. It did state " information pertaining to internet searches pertaining to posts regarding threats of violence directed towards schools or public officials" but there is nothing in the affidavit that suggest or shows evidence that 1. I did any internet search regarding threats of violence directed towards schools or public officials. 2. there is nothing in the affidavit THAT SHOWS THAT THERE IS A LINK BETWEEN MY COMPUTER AND THE THEREAT THAT WAS POSTED ON HATE AND FLAME. there has to be a link between the threat and my computer. THAT HAS TO BE IN THE AFFIDAVIT. The ONLY thing the FBI did regarding the threat was inform the police that they had received anonymous tip regarding a threat against a school. An ANONYMOUS TIP that has to be corroborated before being acted on. THE POLICE DIDN'T DO THAT! THE FBI DIDN'T DO THAT! NEITHER INVESTIGATED TO SEE IF THE TIP WAS VALID OR NOT. They are REQUIRED to corroborate the tip before even making an arrest. plain view really shouldn't apply to computers and other digital devices because all files are in plain view. The purpose of particularity portion of the fourth amendment is to limit what they are allowed to look at. since all files are in plain view it makes the fourth amendment useless.