Let's break it down...

[admin]

The police seized every computer in my home, which is shared with my parents. The search warrant was based on a threat made on a message board without first establishing it was posted by me. before you get a search warrant you have to do some investigation and establish a connection between the crime and the person, or in this case, the crime (a threat posted on a website) and my computer. The police ignored this fact and arrested me, and seized my computers without establishing it was me that posted the threat, and when they did learn that there was no link between me and my computer with that threat they didn't care and handed the computers over the FBI to go through them. The search warrant should have never been issued because there was no probable cause, The warrant was also a general search warrant, which is illegal in the United States. The threat wasn't posted by me, and they police knew it, but didn't care and handed the computers over to the FBI so the FBI could rummage through the computers unfettered by unlimited general search warrant. The FBI found a computer-generated image (which is legal Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition US Supreme Court 2002 and Illinois v Alexander Illinois Supreme Court 2003) The FBI stopped the search to get a second warrant which took them 686 days to get the second warrant (which is consider unreasonable) claiming they had lawful possession of the computers under a state warrant. The officer failed to tell the judge that the charges had been dropped, and the warrant had been quashed. Even if the warrant hasn't been quashed it was a general warrant, because it not only seized the devices (there was 15 devices), but it also seized all the data in the computer. Not all the data in devices did they have probable cause for, and the courts (including the US Supreme Court) has stated that the government including the police cannot seize all the data in a computer or phone.