Looks like Daugherty's parents consented to the seizure of the electronic devices

[admin]

Your parents consented.  As they own the house and the property, you had no say in the matter.

As you said..

"No warrant is required since the consent was freely given"

But like I said, the DA won't need to use that...

Plus your own attorney gave permission for the search to continue and the judge made it clear to you the investigation as going to continue.  You changed your story on that from 90 days to 1 year to 3 years... You even had a countdown on Kiwifarms stating that....

---

As I stated many times before, the search warrant was a general warrant because 1. the warrant allowed them to seize everything on the computer. 2. they didn't have probable cause.

You just don't understand. They can seize computers, cellphones and such... It's done every day and the ACLU has no argument about it either...

In fact, they can't just show up, take a couple of files and leave the computers and cellphones, no court would accept those files as valid evidence. Computers need to be search within the boundaries of the search warrant in a quarantined environment.  The FBI agent stated they were only looking for evidence of your school threats when they came across the child porn.

The delay was due to the fact they had to identify the child in the image, which they did do.

You're fucked.

You are wrong, there was no consent, if there was consent, they wouldn't have needed a warrant. Secondly if there was consent, a person giving the consent can at any time remove that consent, which if that was the case as you argue, then us asking for the return of the computers means I had relinquished my consent, and they have to return the computers, but that's not the case, they had a warrant. This was a search warrant issued by a judge.

They can take the computer to search, but in the search warrant they must list what they are looking for with in the computers, which they have probable cause for. they can't seize ever file within the computer, even the US Supreme Court has stated that. YOU don't understand that search and seizure are two things within the fourth amendment. The court have even stated that search and seizure are two separate things under the fourth amendment. Like I said they can take the computer to search, but they can't seize everything on the computer, they can only seize what is listed in the warrant that is the fruits or contraband of a crime which they have probable cause for. A search warrant cannot also be used to list one thing to be search and seized only for law enforcement to look for something else. The plain view doctrine is also limited when it comes computers as the courts has noted that ever file on the computer is in plain view and when a search warrant doesn't particularize what they are looking for with in the electronic device the warrant become a general warrant, and the police officers cannot use plain view doctrine.