1 count for 1 image

[NO TOAD]

No she has to run it by me after all she is working for me.

No she doesn't. She didn't run that 30 day extension by you did she? Nope, she controls all motions 100 percent and since you are incompetent, you can't fire her and you're too much of a chicken shit to do so even if you could.  The only thing she can't do is plead guilty for you but all court procedure, that's her.

The image is real and you know it... Just stop with the chronic lying and schizophrenia.  They have a date of birth and the name of the real victim. You notice she even bother to bring that up, did she???

The Motion is going to be withdrawn as you have no say over that, it will go to trial, and you will be found guilty more than likely. you don't have the money for any more expert witnesses and your parents aren't going to pay for them either, are they? All the bail money is gone.

Oh, and I know you are googling like crazy, but a Nolle Presqui means you can't sue... But you have no choice over that, Tiffany will immediately accept it if he did that, which she can do without your permission.  Only a DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE is suffice for you to base anything for a lawsuit. For that happen, it needs to go to trial. Tiffany has no interest in any civil matters so she won't care.

Oh, and the statute of limitations has expired on everything as it now...  And qualified immunity... And so much other shit...

NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT

[admin]

No she has to run it by me after all she is working for me.

No she doesn't. She didn't run that 30 day extension by you did she? Nope, she controls all motions 100 percent and since you are incompetent, you can't fire her and you're too much of a chicken shit to do so even if you could.  The only thing she can't do is plead guilty for you but all court procedure, that's her.

The image is real and you know it... Just stop with the chronic lying and schizophrenia.  They have a date of birth and the name of the real victim. You notice she even bother to bring that up, did she???

The Motion is going to be withdrawn as you have no say over that, it will go to trial, and you will be found guilty more than likely. you don't have the money for any more expert witnesses and your parents aren't going to pay for them either, are they? All the bail money is gone.

Oh, and I know you are googling like crazy, but a Nolle Presqui means you can't sue... But you have no choice over that, Tiffany will immediately accept it if he did that, which she can do without your permission.  Only a DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE is suffice for you to base anything for a lawsuit. For that happen, it needs to go to trial. Tiffany has no interest in any civil matters so she won't care.

Oh, and the statute of limitations has expired on everything as it now...  And qualified immunity... And so much other shit...

NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT

Actually, YEAH, SHE DID. I've have been well informed of what is going on in person at the public defender's office and via email. 

That image was found under the second warrant (federal warrant) the issue is the first image which was a computer-generated image, which started the whole thing, it was found under the state warrant which as stated before is a general warrant.

No, it's not, we still have money for the witness for the image. you don't know what you are talking about.

Police don't qualified immunity for general warrants, in fact that the only place they don't get qualified immunity. for them not to get qualified immunity 1. that had to have violated a constitutional or statutory right and 2. that right has been well established by the courts. general warrants are unconstitutional under the fourth amendment, and it has been well established by the courts that general warrants are unconstitutional. So, no qualified immunity. (see Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 US Supreme Court (2004) In fact it has been well established since 1927 that general warrants were unconstitutional and a violation of someone rights.  

Groh v. Ramirez | Oyez

[admin]

Finally, how would be a statute of limitations? If there is a statute of limitations, then they shouldn't be going after me. The image they found was under the 2018 warrant not the 2020 warrant, in fact they are using the 2018 warrant for the bases of their case. The 2020 warrant (which was federal warrant) can't be used because they waited too long to obtain it. There is a statute of limitation on how long they can hold onto a device to get a search warrant and FYI it's 31 days. The FBI didn't get the federal search warrant after 686 days or 1 year, 10 months, 15 days. Court will rule that is too long of a wait and therefore unreasonable.

[NO TOAD]

No statute of limitations on sex crimes.

[admin]

No but there is for holding onto something to get a search warrant for and that limit is 31 days.

[admin]

United States v Smith 967 F3.d 198, 210 (2d Cir 2020) United States v Mitchell 565 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2009)

[admin]

It is common for the police to temporarily seize a suspect's personal property if they have probable cause and intend to apply for a warrant to search the property for evidence of a crime. When the police do so, however, the Fourth Amendment requires that they act with diligence to apply for a search warrant.

United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198, 202 (2d Cir. 2020)

[admin]

Let me correct myself a little

That image from the document that you are posting was found under the second warrant (federal warrant) the issue is the first image which was a computer-generated image, which started the whole thing, it was found under the first warrant (state warrant) that is the warrant the state is using in this case (the state warrant) which like I've said many times before is a general warrant. The first image was a computer-generated image while the one under the federal warrant wasn't and they are conflicting the two

[NO TOAD]

NO TOAD

Have a Dick

[admin]

Simply put:

The police without probable cause because they did no investigation to verify if I was the one who made the treat or not. Instead, they based their claim on an uncorroborated tip, without verifying if the tip was valid or not. All they had do is get my IP address and the logs from the website to prove it. But instead of doing that they arrest me, put me in jail for on a $250,000 dollar bond. Then go to a judge, who had just become a judge got a general warrant to seize all my computers, and not stating what the crime was or what they were looking for, nor did they explain how they had probable cause. Then on March 29th they did get the files from the ISP of the Hate and Flame, and it showed that I was not on that site. The Lawyer of NSFN also stated to the police that there was no login requirement, no email verified, impersonation is the status quo; everything I told the police the night I got arrest. Instead of going to the judge and updating them in regard to the search warrant (which they are required to do) on April 6th they ask the FBI to search the computers (although they knew they no longer had probable cause) On April 11th the FBI seized the computers from the police department and on April 16th the charges were dropped, based on lack of probable cause. The FBI was then allowed to rummage through those computers because the search warrant didn't state what they were supposed to look for. Without the particularities they were allowed to rummage and search everywhere in the computers and seize any file they deemed was "contraband". When they found a computer-generated image, they stopped to get a second warrant to search for "child porn" and they wait over a YEAR to get the second warrant. The court has repeatedly stated that waiting over 31 days is unreasonable, and therefore unconstitutional. When the AUSA declined to take the case (probably because he knew there were issues with it) the FBI sent to back to the state on the grounds that everything was on the up and up.