1 count for 1 image

[admin]

"However, the Court expressed concern over the request as it pertained to any computers the government might find at the residence. The Court was satisfied by the government's explanation of why a search of the contents of any computers while at the residence might not be practicable, and thus authorized the government to seize any computer without an on-site search of its contents. But, the Court explained to the government that a computer found during the search of a home likely would contain a wide variety of documents having nothing to do with the alleged criminal activity intermingled with documents that might fall within the scope of the alleged criminal activity. The affidavit provided no information that would suggest otherwise. Neither the application nor the affidavit set forth the types of documents relating to the alleged criminal activity that the government expected to find on the computers. Nor did the government's submission describe the means by which the government planned to search the computer, to avoid a general rummaging through all information on the computer, much of which would be irrelevant to the alleged criminal activity. To the contrary, the government represented that its search of the computer might involve " an examin[ation of] all the stored data to determine which particular files are evidence or instrumentalities of a crime" (Aff. in Support of Warrant Application, ¶ 36(a)) (emphasis added).
The Court told the government that in order to address these concerns, prior to allowing any search of the contents of the computers, the Court would require the government to provide a protocol outlining the methods it would use to ensure that its search was reasonably designed to focus on documents related to the alleged criminal activity. The purpose of this protocol was to provide the Court with assurance that the search of the computer after its seizure would not consist merely of a random or general examination of other documents — which, on a home computer, might contain sensitive information regarding health or other personal and private matters completely unrelated to the alleged criminal activity."

In Matter of the 3817 W. West End, First Floor Chicago, 321 F. Supp. 2d 953, 955 (N.D. Ill. 2004)


Sounds familiar, and this was in the Federal Northen District of Illinois. Illinois is known for not put particularities in the search warrant.

[admin]

Plain - View really doesn't work for computers, simply because law enforcement when searching a computer, everything on a computer is in plain view. This renders the fourth amendment useless since a person right to privacy is gone in regard to their computers and cellphones, because again, everything is plain view. The fourth amendment is and has been view by the courts as a "RIGHT" to privacy law, meaning it is there to stop the government from rummaging through your property and papers and protect your right to privacy. The purpose of the particularity requirement is to limit the government intrusion into your private life.

[NO TOAD]

PEDOTOAD SHOWING HIS AUTISM AS HE REPEATS THE SAME SHIT ENDLESSLY

[admin]

Nope show where the post I just posted it was posted before... Your claiming shit, because YOU can argue the fact that I am right.

[NO TOAD]

NO TOAD

WITH RETARDED PEOPLE, PROVING THEY ARE RIGHT MEANS THE WORLD TO THEM.

TOO BAD THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SAYS YOU'RE WRONG.

THE ONLY THING THAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT MONTH IS YOUR LAWYER FILES A DELAY TO RESPOND TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO DENY THE MOTION. IT WILL BE A TWO MONTH DELAY, THEN SHE IS GOING TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION AND IT IS GOING TO TRIAL DURING THE SUMMER OF 2025.

IF THAT HAPPENS, BOTH ME AND KIWIFARMS WILL BE THERE TO SEE YOU CRY IN COURT LIKE WHEN YOU GOT ARRESTED IN 2018 AND AGAIN DURING THE POLICE INTERROGATION

BOO HOO

[admin]

So you're autistic because you always claim "I win" like a spastic RETARD

Doubt it, if its gets denied then I will appeal, if anything I will file a in the federal court a trial de novo and represent myself pro se.

I doubt there will be many more delays, the statute of limitation is running out.

[admin]

Sitting on my desk next to my computer, The N9OGL repeater.

[NO TOAD]

NO TOAD

Doubt it, if its gets denied then I will appeal, if anything I will file a in the federal court a trial de novo and represent myself pro se.

You're not allowed to. The judge will never allow you to dismiss Tiffany as your council as you are an incapacitated adult who is under the legal guardianship of your parents unless you have private council hired.

Tiffany and she alone decides your court motions, she will file for a delay and there is nothing you can do about it. She might work for your defense but she decides everything except the words GUILTY.  She will ask for a delay without your having input, she will TELL YOU and you won't do a thing but bitch like a little child on the internet.  It will be decided upon when they meet up for a meal without any input from you.

In fact, you said you were going to appeal if any delays happened after May 2023, of course there's been over a dozen of them and nothing from you.

So you're autistic because you always claim "I win" like a spastic RETARD

I do that for your benefit. Remember, you were the one who was labeled retarded in school and in fact, the program you were under was paid for by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of RETARDED CITIZENS. I kid you not, look it up.

Jeremy of course didn't have to go through that program.
No statute of limitations on child pornography possession charges and even if it did, your lawyer already waived your right to speedy trial. Again, you have no say in that.

That non-working DRM counterfeit repeater picture is from 2021. Even your boyfriend K9GO couldn't fix it for you. You were warned about it

[admin]

If the judge denies the motion to suppress then I could appeal it, if they denied that, and it's on record that I can't appeal it then I can go to federal courts as ask for a trial de novo and do it pro se. Tiffany has nothing to do with it. once it's denied and the appeal is denied I can appeal it into the federal court for 1. violation of my right to due process 2. right to a frank hearing 3. an unconstitutional general warrant. I've already talk to the federal courts about it, and they sent me the paperwork, I just waiting to see if what happens. I will appeal it, I AM GOING TO FIGHT THIS SHIT

As for the DMR repeater non-working? I beg to differ, it is working, I got it fixed I would of have told K9GO but he's dead. ALL I had to do was open it up and change the memory channel to the channel that had the right frequency, that was it.

[admin]

BTW for when and if they denied that have to have a really, really good reason. The reality is we are waiting for the state who is trying to wiggle their way out this mess because they know they are going to get sue.


IT IS A GENERAL SEARCH WARRANT....THERE IS NO REASON WHY THEY WILL DENIED IT!!