Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
One of the key issues
#1
The state doesn't believe "any warrants previous issued are hereby quashed" is what we believe it is so here some stuff I found!


"Any warrant previously issued is hereby quashed" means that all warrants that were issued before this statement are now considered invalid and removed from the system, effectively applying to every warrant that existed prior to that point in time; essentially, it cancels all outstanding warrants


"Any warrant previously issued is hereby quashed" means that any warrant that was previously issued is now considered null and void, and this applies to search warrants as well; essentially, it cancels any existing search warrants that may have been issued in a particular case. 


Black Law Dictionary:

ANY. Some; one out of many; an indefinite number. State v. Pierson, 204 Iowa 837, 216 N. W. 43, 44. One indiscriminately of whatever kind or quantity. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. Winton, C.C.A.Tenn., 131 F.2d 780, 782. One or some (indefinitely). Slegel v. Siegel, 135 N.J.Eq. 5, 37 A.2d 57, 58. "Any" does not necessarily mean only one person, but may have reference to more than one or to many. Doherty v. King, Tex.Civ. App., 183 S.W.2d 1004, 1007. As a synonym for "some". Kayser v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California, 234 Iowa 310, 12 N.W.2d 582, 587.

It is often synonymous with "either", State v. Antonio, 3 Brev. (S.C.) 562; Carr-Lowry Lumber Co. v. Martin, 144 Miss. 106, 109 So. 849, 850. And is given the full force of "every" or "all", Glen Alden Coal Co. v. City of Scranton, 282 Pa 45, 127 A. 307, 308; Southern Ry. Co. v. Gaston County, 200 N.C. 780, 158 S.E. 481. Its generality may be restricted by the context, Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Bates County v. Bates County, Mo.Sup., 216 S.W. 949, 953. Thus, the giving of a right to do some act "at any time" is commonly construed as meaning within a reasonable time. Paulson v. Weeks, 80 Or. 468, 157 P. 590, 592, Ann.Cas. 1918D, 741. And the words "any other" following the enumeration of particular classes are to be read as "other such like," and include only others of like kind or character. Southern Ry. Co. v. Columbia Compress Co., C.C.A.S.C., 280 F. 344, 348. 

PREVIOUSLY. An adverb of time, used in com paring an act or state named with another act or state, subsequent in order of time, for the purpose of asserting the priority of the first. Lebrecht v. Wilcoxon, 40 Iowa 94.

QUASH. To overthrow; to abate; to vacate; to annul; to make void. Spelman; 3 Bl.Comm. 303. Bosley v. Bruner, 2 Cushm. (Miss.) 462; Wilson v. Commonwealth, 157 Va. 776, 162 S.E. 1, 2.
Reply
#2
The warrant was quashed and there is NOTHING in the motion to dismiss in 2018 that suggest that I gave consent to allow the continuation of the search.
Reply
#3
The warrant was quashed, despite what the state believes, there was nothing in motion to dismiss in 2018 that states that the police can retain the computers, nor is there anything that suggest that I consented to them hanging onto the computers. Even if the search warrant wasn't quashed, they still have the issue of the warrant being a general warrant. There also the issue that they went through images, which is NOWHERE mentioned in either the warrant or affidavit to be search.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)