![[Image: retard2.jpg]](http://160.32.227.211/retard2.jpg)
NO, actually here's what happened. The FBI agent that was the forensic expert and found it identified it as "computer generated" another FBI agent (i.e. a different FBI agent) who went to the federal courts claimed it was REAL child porn. The agent LIED to the judge. In fact, in the motion to dismiss there is evidence of this. When the material was handed over to the State of Illinois Police the police claimed, what FBI agent Wright claimed, that it was real child porn, when in in fact it was computer generated.
The fact is Agent Wright omitted that fact that the image was computer generated, he omitted that the search was a warrantless search, he omitted that they had NO valid search warrant, he omitted that they waited two years to get the second warrant from the judge. The FBI had no valid search warrant when they searched my computer, the state warrant which they had was quashed before they even began the search. The warrant was quashed on April 16th, 2018, they began the search on the computer's a week later. They had NO RIGHTS to those computers. Even if the state search warrant was valid and not quashed, it still wasn't valid because a GENERAL WARRANT. It was a general warrant because it did not particularize what they were seizing. The warrant allowed them to seize all the computers in my house, it didn't state what the crime was or what file they were to seize that was associated with the that crime. Nor did they link me or the computer to the crime, quite the opposite, they knew before executing the warrant that I didn't do it.
