The Good Faith Exception

[TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER]

You're fucked. McWard is using the Good Faith Exception and it's going to hold up.

Good Faith Exception (with limitations): However, it's important to be aware of the "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule. This exception can allow evidence to be admitted even if the warrant was defective, if the officers executing the warrant reasonably and in good faith believed that it was valid. The good faith exception doesn't apply if the warrant was obtained using deception, misconduct, or if the warrant was clearly deficient in some way that an officer should have recognized

Return of Property: Generally, if the search warrant is quashed and no other legal basis exists for keeping your property, you should be able to get your computers back. You may need to file a "motion for return of property" with the court to initiate this process.
Conditions for Return: The court may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the computers and their potential use as evidence in future proceedings, even if they are returned to you. 

You filed no "Motion for Return of Property"

They got you MOTHER FUCKER

[N9OGL REPEAT BOT]

Toad should have hired a real lawyer which would have made these wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, Todd just whined, complained, and bitched on message boards instead of actually hiring legal counsel.

[admin]

Let’s get something straight.
The Good Faith Exception doesn’t apply when law enforcement knew or should have known the warrant was invalid. In my case:

• The original state warrant was quashed on April 16, 2018.
  
• The FBI accessed and cataloged my devices after the warrant was quashed, and before obtaining a second warrant.
  
• The second warrant, issued in 2020, falsely claimed the FBI was in legal possession under the original state warrant—which had already been invalidated.
  

That’s not good faith. That’s misrepresentation of legal status, and it directly violates the standards set in Franks v. Delaware and United States v. Leon. The Good Faith Exception does not protect deliberate misconduct or reliance on a warrant known to be invalid.
As for the return of property:

• The devices were seized under a warrant that was later quashed.
  
• Continued possession without a valid legal basis is unlawful.
  
• Whether or not a formal “Motion for Return of Property” was filed, the State and FBI had a duty to return the property once the warrant was invalidated.
  
• The fact that they didn’t—and instead used the devices to build a second warrant—only strengthens the case for suppression and civil rights violations.
  

So no, they don’t “got me.” What they’ve got is a timeline of misconduct, a pattern of delay, and a constitutional mess that’s going to be exposed.

[admin]

The warrant was not only invalid—it was a general warrant issued without probable cause. The State failed to investigate or corroborate the tip, arrested me without evidence, and seized all my devices under a blanket warrant. This is the exact abuse the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent. The Good Faith Exception cannot rescue a warrant that was unconstitutional from the start.

[TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER]

Nope, they got you on the Good Faith... And the DA knows it. The form the local police used is a standard form approved by the Illinois Supreme Court and all they do is fill in the blanks. Your public defender at the time never challenged it and the judge read it and approved it. Now, if your public defender in 2018 didn't even bother to check out the warrant, well, that's on you and him. I told you to hire a real lawyer. Snooze you lose.

As you posted from running your mouth, the FBI found child porn in May, then notified the locals they found the child porn, and at that time did they tell the FBI the case was dismissed. You made no attempt to get your computers back nor contact anyone to get them back from the FBI. Thus the FBI found the child porn on Good Faith. In fact, you posted in 2021 that you thought the computers were still on the floor at your police station and they never turned them over to the FBI? Remember that?

Plus the judge said the investigation could continue, and you admitted that in court when the judge instructed you.

You're fucked when it comes to that. I hope your new attorney pulls back that Motion to Dismiss and works on it to get it right. In fact, I'm sure they will because they aren't going to go in with a document to Dismiss they didn't draft themselves. Of course, it will cost your father countless amounts of money, far more than $6,250 but your Daddy will pony up the money to keep his baby bitch out of prison. And your Dad will get double billed because if your new lawyer talks to those lawyers in DC, your father has to pay BOTH of them.

You're fucked.

---

Oh, and you are still too retarded to respond on your own, I can make AI say whatever I want. Like my AI says you are a pedophile. Is the AI lying or being manipulated?

---

the tip was collaborated. From your past criminal history, which a DA can use, to your threats to Twitter the day after, to your lengthy FBI file that you posted that includes your threat to kill Brian Crow for a $5,000 bounty. You lying to the police during your interrogation on several things like lying that you knew nothing about school shootings when they proved that you did by your own Twitter postings. That is all collaboration.

You're fucked.

[admin]

Let’s separate fact from fiction.

1. The Good Faith Exception doesn’t apply when the warrant is a general warrant, issued without probable cause, and executed after being quashed. The form used may be standardized, but that doesn’t excuse the failure to investigate or corroborate the tip. The Fourth Amendment isn’t waived by filling in blanks.
   
2. The FBI accessed my devices after the warrant was quashed—that’s not good faith, that’s misconduct. Whether my public defender challenged it in 2018 or not doesn’t change the fact that the search was unconstitutional. The law doesn’t expire because someone failed to act.
   
3. The State and FBI both knew the case was dismissed when they continued to search. That’s not a misunderstanding—it’s a violation. And the fact that I didn’t retrieve my property doesn’t give them license to search it unlawfully.
   
4. The judge saying the investigation could continue doesn’t override constitutional protections. Investigations can continue—but they must do so lawfully. That’s the entire point of my motion.
   
5. As for your personal attacks and defamatory claims—they’re not just irrelevant, they’re beneath the dignity of this conversation. You can’t manipulate AI to make false accusations and expect that to stand. That’s not clever—it’s reckless.
   

I’m not responding to win an argument with you. I’m responding to document the truth. And the truth is: I’m not “fucked.” I’m fighting back—with facts, law, and persistence. You can mock that all you want. It doesn’t change the outcome.

[admin]

Corroboration requires independent verification of the specific facts alleged—not assumptions based on unrelated behavior or prior history. The State failed to investigate the tip, failed to establish probable cause, and relied on a general warrant to seize everything. That’s not corroboration. That’s unconstitutional.

[TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER]

More AI nonsense which I ignore. I can make Ai say whatever I want. Too retarded to speak in your words, eh retard?

I suggest you start working with your new lawyer, who probably would be very upset that you continue to talk about the case online. I see you aren't upset about only having $6,250 as your Daddy is paying well above that for your new attorney. I hope you don't fuck it up like you did your last lawyer by calling her a whore.

The state, city, and FBI are still waiting for those certified letters, receipt requested stuff you wrote on July 4th. Of course, you will never send them because you in real life, your a little girl who needs your parents to change your diaper for you.

---

Oh, and your threat to that school is considered an immanent threat which means they can act immediately. And like I said, lying to the police during your interview instead of just asking for a lawyer, that was really really stupid.

[admin]

The state, city, and FBI are still waiting for those certified letters, receipt requested stuff you wrote on July 4th.

So you work for them? Good—thanks for confirming. That makes your ongoing harassment not just personal, but potentially state-affiliated misconduct.
Under Illinois law (720 ILCS 5/26.5), harassment via electronic communication is a criminal offense when it involves:
- Repeated contact with intent to harass, annoy, or threaten
- False accusations or defamation
- Interference with legal proceedings or intimidation
Your messages—mocking my legal filings, making defamatory claims, and attempting to discourage me from asserting my rights—fit that pattern. And if you’re affiliated with law enforcement or the State, it raises serious civil rights concerns.
I’m documenting everything. And if you’re part of the system I’m challenging, then you’ve just made yourself part of the record.

[TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER]

Blah, Blah, AI stuff removed. So I repeat the question....

The state, city, and FBI are still waiting for those certified letters, receipt requested stuff you wrote on July 4th.